These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 975812)
61. The role of the intrauterine device in contraceptive practice. Simcock B Aust Fam Physician; 1976 Mar; 5(2):124-39. PubMed ID: 942338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Editorial: IUDs and heavy periods. Br Med J; 1976 Feb; 1(6005):304. PubMed ID: 1247833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Comparison of copper T-200 with Lippes loop as a contraceptive device. Wright EA; Aisien OA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Jun; 29(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 2568294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Experience with the Ypsilon (Soichet) intrauterine device. Yarkoni S; Sadovsky E Isr J Med Sci; 1978 Feb; 14(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 649355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings. Mumford SD; Kessel E Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. [Use of intrauterine devices (IUD) in nulliparous young women]. Marchino GL; Mimmo B; Grio R; Garyphallides N Minerva Ginecol; 1986 Apr; 38(4):291-3. PubMed ID: 3725168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Long-term study of the safety of the Dalkon Shield and Gyne-T 200 intrauterine devices. Rioux JE; Cloutier D; Dupont P; Lamonde D CMAJ; 1986 Apr; 134(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 3948091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Risk factors and safety of intrauterine devices]. Grospietsch G; Barthel R Med Monatsschr Pharm; 1994 Apr; 17(4):114-6. PubMed ID: 8196566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Evaluation of copper-7 intrauterine device in Malaysian women. Sivanesaratnam V; Puvan IS; Sinnathuray TA Med J Aust; 1975 Aug; 2(8):298-301. PubMed ID: 1165736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Assessing the intrauterine device. Mishell DR Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 1140345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Complications of the intrauterine device in nulliparous and parous women. Veldhuis HM; Vos AG; Lagro-Janssen AL Eur J Gen Pract; 2004 Sep; 10(3):82-7. PubMed ID: 15534571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The Copper T 220C: a new long-acting copper intrauterine contraceptive device. Cooper DL; Millen AK; Mishell DR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jan; 124(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1247047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A study on the contraceptive effectiveness of a newly designed IUD "FD-1" in Japan. Wagatsuma T; Sakamoto S; Matsuyama E; Amenomori Y; Kobayashi T; Takada M; Matsuda S; Fujimoto S; Shimizu T; Suzuki M; Ishihama A; Nakanishi T; Sunouchi S; Sekiba K Contraception; 1978 Jan; 17(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 627148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Incomplete Lippes loop expulsion due to cervical translocation. Gunaratne M Indian J Med Res; 1975 Mar; 63(3):382-4. PubMed ID: 1240091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. [Basic study of disorders caused by placement of IUD with special reference to inflammation]. Watabe T Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1971 Sep; 23(9):855-63. PubMed ID: 5165749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Intrauterine contraception with the Antigon-F device. Cederqvist LL; Lauersen NH; Donovan S; Fuchs F Adv Plan Parent; 1975; 10(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 1164984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Is there inadequate awareness amongst patients and medical students of the risks of concurrent menstrual cup and IUD/IUS usage? Ruddock-Ward K; Lane S Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2020 Dec; 25(6):502-503. PubMed ID: 32852236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]