These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9758503)

  • 21. Stay in school? Results of a sexually transmitted diseases screening program in San Francisco high schools-2007.
    Barry PM; Scott KC; McCright J; Snell A; Lee M; Bascom T; Kent CK; Klausner JD
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Jun; 35(6):550-2. PubMed ID: 18356770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
    Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The chlamydia problem in New Zealand.
    Perkins N
    N Z Med J; 2004 May; 117(1194):U887. PubMed ID: 15156205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Towards screening for Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Kolmos HJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Aug; 159(34):5104-5. PubMed ID: 9297316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Rasmussen KL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Apr; 158(18):2560-1. PubMed ID: 8686014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Testing asymptomatic patients for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Jan; 41(342):37. PubMed ID: 2003958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: which group should be targeted and at what price?].
    van Vloten WA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):652-3. PubMed ID: 10321294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
    Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
    BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; Jager JC; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov; 143(47):2383-5. PubMed ID: 10590778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chlamydia trachomatis positivity rates among men tested in selected venues in the United States: a review of the recent literature.
    Rietmeijer CA; Hopkins E; Geisler WM; Orr DP; Kent CK
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S8-S18. PubMed ID: 18449072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Missed opportunities for early detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea in school-based health centers.
    Nsuami M; Taylor SN; Sanders LS; Martin DH
    Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Dec; 33(12):703-5. PubMed ID: 16773033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening for chlamydia trachomatis: barriers for homeless young people.
    Henning D; Alice R; Sanci L; Dunning T
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2007; 24(3):8-13. PubMed ID: 17518159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Ruitenberg EN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May; 143(19):1012. PubMed ID: 10368724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Universal screening or prophylactic treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women seeking induced abortions: which strategy is more cost-effective?
    Chen S; Li J; van den Hoek A
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Apr; 34(4):230-6. PubMed ID: 17414068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implementing Chlamydia screening programs in juvenile correctional settings: the california experience.
    Miller JL; Samoff E; Bolan G;
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S53-7. PubMed ID: 18449073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors influencing women's views on the acceptability and experience of being opportunistically screened for Chlamydia trachomatis in hospital settings.
    McMillan LE; Norman JE; Murray K; Reid ME
    Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):821-5. PubMed ID: 17212859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Universal antenatal chlamydia screening by rural midwives.
    Curran G
    Aust Nurs J; 2012 Feb; 19(7):30-2. PubMed ID: 22390013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Routine screening for Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infections in men.
    Taylor-Robinson D
    Int J STD AIDS; 1995; 6(4):297; author reply 298. PubMed ID: 7548296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Screening for pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic men who have sex with men.
    Coughlan E; Young S
    N Z Med J; 2006 Apr; 119(1232):U1948. PubMed ID: 16633402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.