These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9758503)

  • 41. Chlamydia screening may reduce pelvic inflammatory disease rates.
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 1996 Oct; 10(5):317. PubMed ID: 11361542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male Chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City.
    Pathela P; Hennessy RR; Blank S; Parvez F; Franklin W; Schillinger JA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 17989586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Is jail screening associated with a decrease in Chlamydia positivity among females seeking health services at community clinics?-San francisco, 1997-2004.
    Barry PM; Kent CK; Scott KC; Goldenson J; Klausner JD
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S22-8. PubMed ID: 18418298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Screening male prisoners for Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on test positivity among women from their neighborhoods who were tested in family planning clinics.
    Peterman TA; Newman DR; Goldberg M; Anschuetz GL; Salmon M; Satterwhite CL; Berman SM
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jul; 36(7):425-9. PubMed ID: 19525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia.
    Spasovski MS; Simjanovska LJ; Taleski V; Petrova N; Lazetic L; Popeska Z; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC; Efremov GD
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15987287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. High cost of Chlamydia can be cut, researcher finds.
    Silversides A
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1119. PubMed ID: 10234330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.
    Domeika M; Oscarsson L; Hallén A; Hjelm E; Sylvan S
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jul; 21(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 17567309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Mathematical modeling study of school-based chlamydia screening: potential impact on chlamydia prevalence in intervention schools and surrounding communities.
    Rönn MM; Dunville R; Wang LY; Bellerose M; Malyuta Y; Menzies NA; Aslam M; Lewis F; Walker-Baban C; Asbel L; Parchem S; Masinter L; Perez E; Gift TL; Hsu K; Barrios LC; Salomon JA
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):1363. PubMed ID: 32891137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prediction of costs, effectiveness, and disease control of a population-based program using home sampling for diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.
    Andersen B; Gundgaard J; Kretzschmar M; Olsen J; Welte R; Oster-Gaard L
    Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):407-15. PubMed ID: 16601656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Universal prophylaxis for Chlamydia trachomatis and anaerobic vaginosis in women attending for suction termination of pregnancy: an audit of short-term health gains.
    Blackwell AL; Emery SJ; Thomas PD; Wareham K
    Int J STD AIDS; 1999 Aug; 10(8):508-13. PubMed ID: 10471099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Chlamydia cascade: enhanced STD prevention strategies for adolescents.
    Chiaradonna C
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 21(5):233-41. PubMed ID: 18794017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sustained Reduction in Chlamydia Infections Following a School-Based Screening: Detroit, 2010-2015.
    Dunville R; Peterson A; Liddon N; Roach M; Coleman K; Dittus P
    Am J Public Health; 2018 Feb; 108(2):231-233. PubMed ID: 29267064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Audit evaluating the value of routine screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infections in men.
    Harry TC; Saravanamuttu KM; Rashid S; Shrestha TL
    Int J STD AIDS; 1994; 5(5):374-5. PubMed ID: 7819362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. New methods are needed to assess the burden of illness from chlamydia.
    Simms I; Hughes G; Catchpole M
    BMJ; 1998 Sep; 317(7159):680-1. PubMed ID: 9728010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. New tools ready for Chlamydia diagnosis, treatment, but teens need education most.
    Randall T
    JAMA; 1993 Jun; 269(21):2716-8. PubMed ID: 8492386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in a Turkish population.
    Ertem E; Dereli D; Serter D; Yüce K
    Genitourin Med; 1991 Aug; 67(4):354-5. PubMed ID: 1916803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Recommendations for screening high school students for chlamydia and gonorrhea in San Francisco.
    Nsuami M
    Sex Transm Dis; 2003 Apr; 30(4):367; author reply 368. PubMed ID: 12671561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis?].
    Frimodt-Møller N; Lisby JG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Dec; 159(50):7511-2. PubMed ID: 9414577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. The case for screening is made, but much detail remains to be worked out.
    Boag F; Kelly F
    BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7143):1474. PubMed ID: 9582128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.