These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9758966)

  • 1. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness.
    Alster D; Feilzer AJ; de Gee AJ; Davidson CL
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 9758966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tensile strength of thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness.
    Alster D; Feilzer AJ; De Gee AJ; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 1995 Nov; 74(11):1745-8. PubMed ID: 8530735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contraction stress and bond strength to dentinfor compatible and incompatible combinations of bonding systems and chemical and light-cured core build-up resin composites.
    Bolhuis PB; de Gee AJ; Kleverlaan CJ; El Zohairy AA; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 16443265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of polymerization shrinkage stress by means of a photoelastic investigation.
    Ernst CP; Meyer GR; Klöcker K; Willershausen B
    Dent Mater; 2004 May; 20(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 15019444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of system compliance and sample geometry on composite polymerization shrinkage stress.
    Laughlin GA; Williams JL; Eick JD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(5):671-8. PubMed ID: 12209915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of polymerization contraction stress of three composite resins.
    Cadenaro M; Biasotto M; Scuor N; Breschi L; Davidson CL; Di Lenarda R
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 17765300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of instrument compliance and specimen thickness on the polymerization shrinkage stress measurement of light-cured composites.
    Lee SH; Chang J; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1093-100. PubMed ID: 17112580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness.
    Coelho PG; Calamia C; Harsono M; Thompson VP; Silva NR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18374973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tensile bond strength of dual curing resin-based cements to commercially pure titanium.
    Schneider R; de Goes MF; Henriques GE; Chan DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 16442156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of temperature on the silane coupling agents when bonding core resin to quartz fiber posts.
    Monticelli F; Toledano M; Osorio R; Ferrari M
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1024-8. PubMed ID: 16364422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding of photo and dual-cure adhesives to root canal dentin.
    Foxton RM; Nakajima M; Tagami J; Miura H
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):543-51. PubMed ID: 14531600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polymerization stress of resin composites as a function of system compliance.
    Gonçalves F; Pfeifer CS; Meira JB; Ballester RY; Lima RG; Braga RR
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):645-52. PubMed ID: 17719626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between contraction stress and degree of conversion in restorative composites.
    Calheiros FC; Braga RR; Kawano Y; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):939-46. PubMed ID: 15501322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shrinkage stress in light-cured composite resins: influence of material and photoactivation mode.
    Charton C; Colon P; Pla F
    Dent Mater; 2007 Aug; 23(8):911-20. PubMed ID: 17027939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does single versus stepped curing of composite resins affect their shear bond strength?
    Caldwell R; Kulkarni G; Titley K
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2001 Nov; 67(10):588-92. PubMed ID: 11737983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microhardness of resin composites polymerized by plasma arc or conventional visible light curing.
    Park SH; Krejci I; Lutz F
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 11817467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring the residual stress in dental composites using a ring slitting method.
    Park JW; Ferracane JL
    Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):882-9. PubMed ID: 16005954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.