These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9758971)
1. Coating of silicone-based impression materials in a glow-discharge system by acrylic acid plasma. Ozden N; Ayhan H; Erkut S; Can G; Pişkin E Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 9758971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Erkut S; Can G J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials]. Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Kess RS; Combe EC; Sparks BS J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10898846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations. Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of disinfection and a wetting agent on the wettability of addition-polymerized silicone impression materials. Milward PJ; Waters MG J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 11514803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure. Hosseinpour D; Berg JC J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness. Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants. DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials. Al-Johani A; Clark RK; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers. Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. Caputi S; Varvara G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy, detail reproduction, and hardness of gypsum casts produced from silicone impressions treated with glow discharge. Fernandes CP; Vassilakos N J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Nov; 70(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 8254551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions. Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]