These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9758976)

  • 21. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
    Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage evaluation of two newly introduced hybrid glass ionomer cements.
    Chohayeb AA; Fatahi T; Henley GL
    NDA J; 1996; 47(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9594077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of cavity design on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz UB
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9545918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of selected mouthwashes on the surface roughness of resin modified glass-ionomer restorative materials.
    Sadaghiani L; Wilson MA; Wilson NH
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 16530262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of APF gel on the physical structure of compomers and glass ionomer cements.
    Yip KH; Peng D; Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 11357564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Brackett WW; Gilpatrick RO; Browning WD; Gregory PN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10337292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effectiveness of surface protection of resin modified glass ionomer cements evaluated spectrophotometrically.
    Cefaly DF; Seabra BG; Tapety CM; Taga EM; Valera F; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 11504441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz U
    Dent Mater; 1996 Jan; 12(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8598253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gradual surface degradation of restorative materials by acidic agents.
    Hengtrakool C; Kukiattrakoon B; Kedjarune-Leggat U
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e50-62. PubMed ID: 21903509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surface roughness of aesthetic restorative materials: an in vitro comparison.
    Rosen M; Grossman ES; Cleaton-Jones PE; Volchansky A
    SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 11575115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of fluoride gels on micromorphology of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements and polyacid-modified resin composites.
    Turssi CP; de Magalhães CS; Serra MC
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):571-7. PubMed ID: 11495569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing time.
    Yap AU; Ong SB; Yap WY; Tan WS; Yeo JC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 12216564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Neme AL; Frazier KB; Roeder LB; Debner TL
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 11817469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material.
    Yap AU; Mok BY
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 11933907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.