These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9759000)
1. Use of wide-diameter and standard-diameter implants to replace single molars: two case presentations. Blatz MB; Strub JR; Gläser R; Gebhardt W Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 9759000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study. Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: a retrospective clinical report. Romanos GE; Nentwig GH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 11151582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants. Norton MR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 15101600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap. Norton MR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations. Bakaeen LG; Winkler S; Neff PA J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 12498429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Posterior implant-supported single crowns: a new treatment approach]. Bender MF Int J Dent Symp; 1994; 2(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 9117858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: a five-year retrospective study. Vigolo P; Givani A J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 10898842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in mandibular molar sites: a 12-month preliminary report. Cornelini R; Cangini F; Covani U; Barone A; Buser D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):855-60. PubMed ID: 15623061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a longitudinal study. Romeo E; Lops D; Amorfini L; Chiapasco M; Ghisolfi M; Vogel G Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 16584409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A screwless and cementless technique for the restoration of single-tooth implants: a retrospective cohort study. Urdaneta RA; Marincola M; Weed M; Chuang SK J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):562-71. PubMed ID: 18761575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants. Krennmair G; Schmidinger S; Waldenberger O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 11858577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical analysis of wide-diameter frialit-2 implants. Krennmair G; Waldenberger O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):710-5. PubMed ID: 15508987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediately restored, single-tapered implants in the anterior maxilla: prosthodontic and aesthetic outcomes after 1 year. Hall JA; Payne AG; Purton DG; Torr B; Duncan WJ; De Silva RK Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 17362495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols. Turkyilmaz I; Avci M; Kuran S; Ozbek EN Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 18031444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants to restore single teeth in the maxilla: a 7- to 9-year follow-up. MacDonald K; Pharoah M; Todescan R; Deporter D Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Apr; 29(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 19408481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study. Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small diameter implants: specific indications and considerations for the posterior mandible: a case report. Jackson BJ J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():156-64. PubMed ID: 20545550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases. Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]