These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9759024)

  • 1. Resistance to fracture of three all-ceramic systems.
    Neiva G; Yaman P; Dennison JB; Razzoog ME; Lang BR
    J Esthet Dent; 1998; 10(2):60-6. PubMed ID: 9759024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns.
    Sulaiman F; Chai J; Jameson LM; Wozniak WT
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 9495168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study.
    Etman MK; Woolford MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 20141812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Geminiani A; Lee H; Feng C; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all-ceramic crown systems.
    Potiket N; Chiche G; Finger IM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 15523339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of three all-ceramic restorative systems for posterior applications.
    Pallis K; Griggs JA; Woody RD; Guillen GE; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 15211299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro study of the compressive load at fracture of Procera AllCeram crowns with varying thickness of veneer porcelain.
    Webber B; McDonald A; Knowles J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 12616235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of aluminium oxide and lithium disilicate-based crowns using different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Al-Wahadni AM; Hussey DL; Grey N; Hatamleh MM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 19279972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability of fracture of all-ceramic crowns.
    Chai J; Takahashi Y; Sulaiman F; Chong K; Lautenschlager EP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 11203665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro study to investigate the load at fracture of Procera AllCeram crowns with various thickness of occlusal veneer porcelain.
    Harrington Z; McDonald A; Knowles J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 12675456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis.
    Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera AllCeram crowns with four cements.
    Albert FE; El-Mowafy OM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 15543909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the load at fracture of Turkom-Cera to Procera AllCeram and In-Ceram all-ceramic restorations.
    AL-Makramani BM; Razak AA; Abu-Hassan MI
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 19694015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics.
    Wagner WC; Chu TM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Aug; 76(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 8820804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture strength of three all-ceramic systems: Top-Ceram compared with IPS-Empress and In-Ceram.
    Quran FA; Haj-Ali R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Mar; 13(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 22665750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resistance to staining, flexural strength, and chemical solubility of core porcelains for all-ceramic crowns.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Chai J; Sansano S; Shonberg D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 11484579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Fracture resistance of Procera Allceram depending on the framework design--an in vitro study].
    Hagmann E; Marinello CP; Zitzmann NU
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2006; 116(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 16471418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.