103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9759699)
21. Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume in renal cell carcinoma.
Yörükoglu K; Aktas S; Güler C; Sade M; Kirkali Z
Urology; 1998 Jul; 52(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 9671868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume as a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma.
Soda T; Fujikawa K; Ito T; Sasaki M; Nishio Y; Miyakawa M
Lab Invest; 1999 Jul; 79(7):859-67. PubMed ID: 10418826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combining prostate specific antigen with cancer and gland volume to predict more reliably pathological stage: the influence of prostate specific antigen cancer density.
Blackwell KL; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Zincke H; Oesterling JE
J Urol; 1994 Jun; 151(6):1565-70. PubMed ID: 7514689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognosis of primary testicular seminoma: a report on 57 new cases.
Fujikawa K; Matsui Y; Oka H; Fukuzawa S; Sasaki M; Takeuchi H
Cancer Res; 2000 Apr; 60(8):2152-4. PubMed ID: 10786678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer.
Leze E; Maciel-Osorio CF; Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102156. PubMed ID: 25007252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Cooperberg MR; Pasta DJ; Elkin EP; Litwin MS; Latini DM; Du Chane J; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1938-42. PubMed ID: 15879786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of volume weighted mean nuclear volume in predicting the prognosis of patients with primary transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a report of 102 new cases.
Fujikawa K; Matsui Y; Oka H; Fukuzawa S; Sasaki M; Takeuchi H
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):352-5. PubMed ID: 10893583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Predictability of Gleason score and reduction time (tau) of prostatic volume after castration for the prognosis of prostatic cancer].
Hongo F; Nakanouchi T; Nakamura J; Azuma Y; Iida A; Inoue W; Okihara K; Watanabe M; Saitoh M; Watanabe H; Konishi E; Ashihara T
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Nov; 89(11):871-5. PubMed ID: 9866376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Djavan B; Kadesky K; Klopukh B; Marberger M; Roehrborn CG
Eur Urol; 1998; 33(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 9555550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcome of Gleason 3 + 5 = 8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4 + 4 = 8.
Harding-Jackson N; Kryvenko ON; Whittington EE; Eastwood DC; Tjionas GA; Jorda M; Iczkowski KA
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1076-81. PubMed ID: 27265220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Percent Gleason grade 4/5 as prognostic factor in prostate cancer diagnosed at transurethral resection.
Egevad L; Granfors T; Karlberg L; Bergh A; Stattin P
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):509-13. PubMed ID: 12131299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of nuclear morphometry and Gleason grade as a predictor of prognosis in stage A2 prostate cancer: a critical analysis.
Partin AW; Walsh AC; Pitcock RV; Mohler JL; Epstein JI; Coffey DS
J Urol; 1989 Nov; 142(5):1254-8. PubMed ID: 2810502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
