These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9760359)

  • 1. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Kuijs R; Burgersdijk RC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 9760359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 15478487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of internal bevel on marginal leakage at the approximal surface of Class 2 composite restorations.
    Holan G; Eidelman E; Wright GZ
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 9484144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
    Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An In-VitroEvaluation of Microleakage at the Cervical Margin Between two Different Class II Restorative Techniques Using Dye Penetration Method.
    Jawaed NU; Abidi SY; Qazi FU; Ahmed S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Sep; 26(9):748-52. PubMed ID: 27671178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
    Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of beveling and ultrasound application on marginal adaptation of box-only Class II (slot) resin composite restorations.
    Schmidlin PR; Wolleb K; Imfeld T; Gygax M; Lussi A
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 17555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations.
    Bagheri M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 18264534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of load cycling on the microleakage of beveled and nonbeveled margins in class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Ameri H; Ghavamnasiri M; Abdoli E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct; 11(5):025-32. PubMed ID: 20978721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin.
    Owens BM; Halter TK; Brown DM
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 9728146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of microleakage of different margin types around Class V resin restorations in primary teeth.
    Lopes Coutinho TC; Almeida Tostes M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 24295013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of composite resins in cavities of upper primary molars.
    Nozaka K; Suruga Y; Amari E
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1999 Sep; 9(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 10815575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.