These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9760365)

  • 1. Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: an in vitro study.
    Setz I; Lee SH; Engel E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 9760365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retentive force and dislodgment time variations between three implant overdenture stud attachments in an acidic environment: An in-vitro pilot study.
    Farhat M; Daher T; Hajjar JJ; Boulos PJ
    Saudi Dent J; 2024 Feb; 36(2):368-373. PubMed ID: 38419987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case report on implant retained auricular prosthesis: Bringing back hope and smile.
    Gupta D; Thakkur R; Shah B
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 14(1):152-156. PubMed ID: 37273440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Mini Dental Implant Number on Mandibular Overdenture Retention and Attachment Wear.
    Alshenaiber R; Barclay C; Silikas N
    Biomed Res Int; 2023; 2023():7099761. PubMed ID: 37168235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Various Retentive Element Materials on Retention of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    Chindarungruangrat A; Eiampongpaiboon T; Jirajariyavej B
    Molecules; 2022 Jun; 27(12):. PubMed ID: 35745048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Number and Distribution of Mini Dental Implants on Overdenture Stability: An In Vitro Study.
    Alshenaiber R; Barclay C; Silikas N
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Apr; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 35591322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How the initial retentive force of implant-supported overdentures can be affected with splinted and unsplinted attachments systems.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Savabi G; Razavi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():101. PubMed ID: 35265284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thermal Cycling Effect on Locator System Retention and Metal Surface Roughness.
    Perlis V; Mtanis T; Biadsee A; Ormianer Z
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):771-777. PubMed ID: 35061925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In Vitro Effects of Cyclic Dislodgement on Retentive Properties of Various Titanium-Based Dental Implant Overdentures Attachment System.
    Kang TY; Kim JH; Kim KM; Kwon JS
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Nov; 12(22):. PubMed ID: 31744164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Mínguez-Tomás N; Alonso-Pérez-Barquero J; Fernández-Estevan L; Vicente-Escuder Á; Selva-Otaolaurruchi EJ
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Jul; 10(7):e681-e686. PubMed ID: 30057711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Evaluation of Retentive Properties of Two Compatible Ball Attachments in Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Memarian M; Zarrati S; Karimi S; Bahrami M
    J Dent (Tehran); 2018 Mar; 15(2):106-115. PubMed ID: 29971128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative evaluation of fatigue resistance of two different implant overdenture stud attachments with two different denture base materials: An
    Agrawal N; Jain S; Agrawal D
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 29430136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of bar cross-section and female housing material on retention of mandibular implant bar overdentures: A comparative
    Abdel-Khalek EA; Ibrahim AM
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(4):340-347. PubMed ID: 29249877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New mini dental implant attachments versus O-ring attachment after cyclic aging: Analysis of retention strength and gap space.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Cao YG
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Jun; 37(3):419-424. PubMed ID: 28585142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of abutment angulation in the retention and durability of three overdenture attachment systems: An in vitro study.
    Aroso C; Silva AS; Ustrell R; Mendes JM; Braga AC; Berastegui E; Escuin T
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2016 Feb; 8(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 26949484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of changes in retentive force of three stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Kim SM; Choi JW; Jeon YC; Jeong CM; Yun MJ; Lee SH; Huh JB
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 7(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26330977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomaterial aspects: A key factor in the longevity of implant overdenture attachment systems.
    Daou EE
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2015; 5(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 26312224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of inter-implant distance on retention and resistance to dislodging forces for mandibular implant-tissue-supported overdentures.
    Tabatabaian F; Saboury A; Sobhani ZS; Petropoulos VC
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Sep; 11(5):506-15. PubMed ID: 25628676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stud attachments for the mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Prosthetic complications. A literature review.
    Daou EE
    Saudi Dent J; 2013 Apr; 25(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 23960557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wear of double crown systems: electroplated vs. casted female part.
    Bayer S; Kraus D; Keilig L; Gölz L; Stark H; Enkling N
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(3):384-91. PubMed ID: 22858708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.