These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9760627)

  • 1. Speech-Sounds Perception Test: analysis of a randomized answer form.
    Charter RA; Dutra RL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 9760627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech Sounds Perception Test: nonrandom response locations form a logical fallacy in structure.
    Reddon JR; Schopflocher D; Gill DM; Stefanyk WO
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Aug; 69(1):235-40. PubMed ID: 2780184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech-Sounds Perception Test: analysis of error types in normal and diffusely brain-damaged patients.
    Charter RA; Dutra RL; Lopez MN
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1507-10. PubMed ID: 9229477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternate short form of the Speech-Sounds Perception Test.
    Charter RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1184-6. PubMed ID: 10939067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the long vs short form of the speech sounds perception test in a school-age population.
    Gray RM; Livingston RB; Marshall RM; Haak RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):475-80. PubMed ID: 8724918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining random responding for the category, speech-sounds perception, and Seashore Rhythm tests.
    Charter RA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Oct; 16(5):744-8. PubMed ID: 7836497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced accuracy of classification with a short form of the Speech Sounds Perception Test.
    Snow WG; Sheese S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Jun; 52(3):1003-6. PubMed ID: 7267244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cautions in alternate-form presentation of aural test material: Speech Sounds Perception Test.
    Strauss BS; Hartman DE; Soper HV
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Dec; 61(3 Pt 1):899-902. PubMed ID: 4088782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processing of speech and non-speech sounds in aphasic patients as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Ilvonen T; Kujala T; Kozou H; Kiesiläinen A; Salonen O; Alku P; Näätänen R
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 15288425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short form of the Speech Sounds Perception Test.
    Golden CJ; Anderson SM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Oct; 45(2):485-6. PubMed ID: 917703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of simulated hearing loss on speech sounds perception.
    Schear JM; Skenes LL; Larson VD
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1988 Oct; 10(5):597-602. PubMed ID: 3225315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-irrelevant visual letters interact with the processing of speech sounds in heteromodal and unimodal cortex.
    Blau V; van Atteveldt N; Formisano E; Goebel R; Blomert L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):500-9. PubMed ID: 18702722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnitude-estimation scaling of computerized (digitized) speech under different listening conditions.
    Bettagere R; Fucci D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 2):1363-78. PubMed ID: 10485125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnitude estimation scaling judgments of speech intelligibility and speech acceptability.
    Ellis LW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):625-30. PubMed ID: 10483655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Processing steps in perception of speech sounds].
    Kiener S
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(2):194-215. PubMed ID: 1413917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deviant processing of letters and speech sounds as proximate cause of reading failure: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of dyslexic children.
    Blau V; Reithler J; van Atteveldt N; Seitz J; Gerretsen P; Goebel R; Blomert L
    Brain; 2010 Mar; 133(Pt 3):868-79. PubMed ID: 20061325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast multi-feature paradigm for recording several mismatch negativities (MMNs) to phonetic and acoustic changes in speech sounds.
    Pakarinen S; Lovio R; Huotilainen M; Alku P; Näätänen R; Kujala T
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 19646504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of the Speech Sounds Perception Test.
    Bornstein RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Aug; 55(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 7133905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-sounds perception test: long- and short-forms reliability adjusted for item difficulty.
    Charter RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Feb; 92(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 11322601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.