These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9760899)

  • 1. Inter- and intraobserver variability in radiographic bone level assessment at Brånemark fixtures.
    Gröndahl K; Sundén S; Gröndahl HG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Aug; 9(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 9760899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.
    Pikner SS
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (194):5-69, 2. PubMed ID: 18652086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Brånemark dental implants.
    Sundén S; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Dec; 6(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 8603113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Intraoral Radiographs Accurate in Determining the Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level?
    Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30025001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
    Batenburg RH; Meijer HJ; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9780899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions.
    Astrand P; Engquist B; Dahlgren S; Gröndahl K; Engquist E; Feldmann H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 15248875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system.
    Quirynen M; Naert I; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Sep; 3(3):104-11. PubMed ID: 1290790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Sep; 32(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 16104954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of angulation of Brånemark titanium fixtures from radiographic thread images.
    Sewerin IP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 1807418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic evaluation, following delivery of fixed reconstructions, at GBR treated titanium fixtures.
    Mayfield L; Skoglund A; Nobréus N; Attström R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Oct; 9(5):292-302. PubMed ID: 9835808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting a partial bridge. An up to 6-years retrospective study.
    Quirynen M; Naert I; van Steenberghe D; Dekeyser C; Callens A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Feb; 19(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 1602036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of peri-implant radiolucencies--an in vitro experiment.
    Sewerin IP; Gotfredsen K; Stoltze K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Aug; 8(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 9586477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiological evaluation of marginal bone loss at tooth surfaces facing single Brånemark implants.
    Esposito M; Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1993 Sep; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 8297963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new self-tapping Brånemark implant: clinical and radiographic evaluation.
    Friberg B; Grondahl K; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 1398828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are intraoral radiographs reliable in determining peri-implant marginal bone level changes? The correlation between open surgical measurements and peri-apical radiographs.
    Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1358-1364. PubMed ID: 29866412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Brånemark fixture integration and short-term survival using one-stage or two-stage surgery in completely and partially edentulous mandibles.
    Collaert B; De Bruyn H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Apr; 9(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 9663041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Placement of Brånemark implants in the maxillary tuber region: anatomical considerations, surgical technique and long-term results.
    Ridell A; Gröndahl K; Sennerby L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 19126113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Five-year prospective follow-up report of the Astra Tech Dental Implant System in the treatment of edentulous mandibles.
    Arvidson K; Bystedt H; Frykholm A; von Konow L; Lothigius E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Aug; 9(4):225-34. PubMed ID: 9760897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlations between radiographic, clinical and mobility parameters after loading of oral implants with fixed partial dentures. A 2-year longitudinal study.
    Brägger U; Hugel-Pisoni C; Bürgin W; Buser D; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Sep; 7(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 9151587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal bone level changes and prosthetic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 2 implants: a 5-year randomized clinical trial.
    Cehreli MC; Uysal S; Akca K
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19220845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.