These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9761229)
1. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose. Azzara AV; Sclafani A Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 9761229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences compared with sugar- and fat-conditioned preferences in rats. Ackroff K; Rozental D; Sclafani A Physiol Behav; 2004 Jun; 81(4):699-713. PubMed ID: 15178165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose, and fructose in rats. Sclafani A; Fanizza LJ; Azzara AV Physiol Behav; 1999 Aug; 67(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 10477054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flavor preference conditioning as a function of fat source. Ackroff K; Lucas F; Sclafani A Physiol Behav; 2005 Jul; 85(4):448-60. PubMed ID: 15990126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency. Ackroff K; Touzani K; Peets TK; Sclafani A Physiol Behav; 2001 Apr; 72(5):691-703. PubMed ID: 11337001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats. Sclafani A; Cardieri C; Tucker K; Blusk D; Ackroff K Am J Physiol; 1993 Aug; 265(2 Pt 2):R320-5. PubMed ID: 8368385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice. Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: more concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing. Lucas F; Azzara AV; Sclafani A Physiol Behav; 1997 Dec; 63(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 9402608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose: I. Intake acceptance and preference analysis. Myers KP; Sclafani A Physiol Behav; 2001; 74(4-5):481-93. PubMed ID: 11790408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glucose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats: taste versus postingestive conditioning. Sclafani A; Ackroff K Physiol Behav; 1994 Aug; 56(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 7938256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose. II. Taste reactivity analysis. Myers KP; Sclafani A Physiol Behav; 2001; 74(4-5):495-505. PubMed ID: 11790409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration. Ackroff K; Sclafani A Appetite; 2004 Jun; 42(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 15183920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: two-bottle tests revisited. Sclafani A Physiol Behav; 2002 Aug; 76(4-5):633-44. PubMed ID: 12127003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]