159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9762066)
1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: non-invasive imaging for the biliary tree and pancreatic duct.
Little AF; Smith PJ; Hennessy OF; Lee WK
Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):266-9. PubMed ID: 9762066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging of the normal and abnormal pancreaticobiliary system with single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography: a pictorial review.
Little AF; Smith PJ; Lee WK; Hennessy OF; Desmond PV; Banting SW; Lourensz ME
Australas Radiol; 1999 Nov; 43(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 10901953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
Feldman DR; Kulling DP; Kay CL; Cole DJ; Cunningham JT; Hawes RH; Tarnasky PR; Cotton PB; Baron PL
Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 9416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Capps GW; Zfass AM; Baker KM
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The utilities and outlooks of MR cholangiography (MRCP) as a non contrast and noninvasive technique].
Hachiya J; Haradome H
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2747-54. PubMed ID: 9847593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: evaluation in 150 patients.
Tripathi RP; Batra A; Kaushik S
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2002; 21(3):105-9. PubMed ID: 12118921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy.
NIH Consens State Sci Statements; 2002 Jan 14-16; 19(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 14768653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.
Badger WR; Borgert AJ; Kallies KJ; Kothari SN
Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):251-255. PubMed ID: 27986260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [NMR cholangiography in the diagnostic algorithm of candidates to video laparocholecystectomy].
Puglisi F; Magialetti A; Carriero A; Capuano F; De Fazio M; Verzillo F; Martines G; Simone M
Minerva Chir; 2000 Sep; 55(9):581-5. PubMed ID: 11155470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography].
Mitake M; Okamura S; Ohashi S; Urano F; Simodaira M; Kanamori S; Ohyama I; Okada N; Segawa K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2885-9. PubMed ID: 9847615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T: technique optimisation and preliminary results.
Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Messina A; Scipioni A; Di Girolamo M; Passariello R
Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 8797971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic role of secretin-enhanced MRCP in patients with unsuccessful ERCP.
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
World J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 10(20):3034-8. PubMed ID: 15378788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique.
Barish MA; Yucel EK; Soto JA; Chuttani R; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 7618543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
