218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9762886)
1. Lymph node status assessment for gastric carcinoma: is the number of metastatic lymph nodes really practical as a parameter for N categories in the TNM Classification? Tumor Node Metastasis.
Kodera Y; Yamamura Y; Shimizu Y; Torii A; Hirai T; Yasui K; Morimoto T; Kato T; Kito T
J Surg Oncol; 1998 Sep; 69(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 9762886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The number of metastatic lymph nodes: a promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification.
Kodera Y; Yamamura Y; Shimizu Y; Torii A; Hirai T; Yasui K; Morimoto T; Kato T; Kito T
J Am Coll Surg; 1998 Dec; 187(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 9849732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.
Deng J; Zhang R; Pan Y; Wang B; Wu L; Jiao X; Bao T; Hao X; Liang H
Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 24929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer.
Yoo CH; Noh SH; Kim YI; Min JS
World J Surg; 1999 May; 23(5):492-7; discussion 497-8. PubMed ID: 10085399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.
Lauricella S; Caricato M; Mascianà G; Carannante F; Carnazza M; Bonaccorso A; Angeletti S; Ciccozzi M; Coppola R; Capolupo GT
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():223-233. PubMed ID: 32869748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.
Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes?
Lee SY; Hwang I; Park YS; Gardner J; Ro JY
Int J Oncol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1461-7. PubMed ID: 20428770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the anatomical location and the number of metastatic lymph nodes on gastric cancer patient´s survival.
Duchon R; Bernadic M; Pindak D
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2020; 121(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 32356438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma.
Celen O; Yildirim E; Berberoglu U
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 96(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17443727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metastatic lymph node ratio versus number of metastatic lymph nodes as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
Espín F; Bianchi A; Llorca S; Feliu J; Palomera E; García O; Remon J; Suñol X
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 38(6):497-502. PubMed ID: 22445061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Number and anatomical extent of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: analysis using intra-lymph node injection of activated carbon particles (CH40).
Okamoto K; Sawai K; Minato H; Yada H; Shirasu M; Sakakura C; Otsuji E; Kitamura K; Taniguchi H; Hagiwara A; Yamaguchi T; Takahashi T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1999 Feb; 29(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10089947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Disciplinarian of lymph node metastasis and effect of paraaortic lymph nodes dissection on clinical outcomes in advanced gastric carcinoma].
Zhan WH; Han FH; He YL; Li YM; Zheng ZQ; Peng JS; Cai SR; Ma JP
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16437364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Relationship between metastatic rate and amount of lymph nodes and prognosis of gastric cancer].
Li K; Xu HM; Chen JQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 85(30):2113-6. PubMed ID: 16313820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer.
Nelen SD; van Steenbergen LN; Dassen AE; van der Wurff AA; Lemmens VE; Bosscha K
Acta Oncol; 2013 Nov; 52(8):1751-9. PubMed ID: 23317142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in T3 gastric cancer.
Hyung WJ; Noh SH; Yoo CH; Huh JH; Shin DW; Lah KH; Lee JH; Choi SH; Min JS
World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 11865369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after d2 resection regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Xu DZ; Geng QR; Long ZJ; Zhan YQ; Li W; Zhou ZW; Chen YB; Sun XW; Chen G; Liu Q
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 19050970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical value of superior mesenteric vein (No.14v) lymph node dissection in D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced distal gastric cancer].
Lu W; Zeng X; Li N; Liu H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 30370512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
