252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9764228)
1. Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut-out with the gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw.
Haynes RC; Pöll RG; Miles AW; Weston RB
Injury; 1997; 28(5-6):337-41. PubMed ID: 9764228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An experimental study of the failure modes of the Gamma Locking Nail and AO Dynamic Hip Screw under static loading: a cadaveric study.
Haynes RC; Pöll RG; Miles AW; Weston RB
Med Eng Phys; 1997 Jul; 19(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 9338885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The early failure of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw in femurs with a wide medullary canal. A biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures.
Ceynowa M; Zerdzicki K; Klosowski P; Pankowski R; Rocławski M; Mazurek T
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():201-207. PubMed ID: 31775090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.
Buyukdogan K; Caglar O; Isik S; Tokgozoglu M; Atilla B
Injury; 2017 Feb; 48(2):414-418. PubMed ID: 27889112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Locking plates increase the strength of dynamic hip screws.
Jewell DP; Gheduzzi S; Mitchell MS; Miles AW
Injury; 2008 Feb; 39(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 17880976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk].
Friedl W; Clausen J
Chirurg; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1344-52. PubMed ID: 11766660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures.
Bess RJ; Jolly SA
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 9322196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The AO dynamic hip screw and the Pugh sliding nail in femoral head fixation.
Richards RH; Evans G; Egan J; Shearer JR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1990 Sep; 72(5):794-6. PubMed ID: 2211758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut-out with the gamma locking nail and the AO dynamic hip screw.
Parker MJ
Injury; 1998 Sep; 29(7):569. PubMed ID: 10193508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does an additional antirotation U-Blade (RC) lag screw improve treatment of AO/OTA 31 A1-3 fractures with gamma 3 nail?
Lang NW; Arthold C; Joestl J; Gormasz A; Boesmueller S; Hajdu S; Sarahrudi K
Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2733-2738. PubMed ID: 27832831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cutting-out of the lag screw after internal fixation with the Asiatic gamma nail.
Kawaguchi S; Sawada K; Nabeta Y
Injury; 1998 Jan; 29(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9659482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of two different trochanteric nail lag-screw designs on fixation stability of four-part intertrochanteric fractures: a clinical and biomechanical study.
Takemoto RC; Lekic N; Schwarzkopf R; Kummer FJ; Egol KA
J Orthop Sci; 2014 Jan; 19(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 24248549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical characterisation of osteosyntheses for proximal femur fractures: helical blade versus screw.
Al-Munajjed AA; Hammer J; Mayr E; Nerlich M; Lenich A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():1-10. PubMed ID: 18376008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of lag screw position for the stabilization of trochanteric fractures with a sliding hip screw: a subject-specific finite element study.
Goffin JM; Pankaj P; Simpson AH
J Orthop Res; 2013 Apr; 31(4):596-600. PubMed ID: 23138576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement.
Kane P; Vopat B; Heard W; Thakur N; Paller D; Koruprolu S; Born C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 472(8):2492-8. PubMed ID: 24760583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.
Stern R; Lübbeke A; Suva D; Miozzari H; Hoffmeyer P
Int Orthop; 2011 Dec; 35(12):1855-61. PubMed ID: 21387175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The trochanteric nail versus the sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a review of 93 cases.
Crawford CH; Malkani AL; Cordray S; Roberts CS; Sligar W
J Trauma; 2006 Feb; 60(2):325-8; discussion 328-9. PubMed ID: 16508490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the rotation of the femoral head a potential initiation for cutting out? A theoretical and experimental approach.
Lenich A; Bachmeier S; Prantl L; Nerlich M; Hammer J; Mayr E; Al-Munajjed AA; Füchtmeier B
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Apr; 12():79. PubMed ID: 21513536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intertrochanteric fracture: Association between the coronal position of the lag screw and stress distribution.
Liang C; Peng R; Jiang N; Xie G; Wang L; Yu B
Asian J Surg; 2018 May; 41(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 28366494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proximal Femoral Nail Unlocked versus Locked (ProFNUL): a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-armed randomised controlled trial for the effect of femoral nail mode of lag screw locking and screw configuration in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures.
Sivakumar A; Thewlis D; Ladurner A; Edwards S; Rickman M
BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e032640. PubMed ID: 32047013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
