These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2624 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9764259)

  • 1. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.
    Downs SH; Black N
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Jun; 52(6):377-84. PubMed ID: 9764259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of validation studies on self-report instruments for physical activity and sedentary behavior.
    Hagströmer M; Ainsworth BE; Kwak L; Bowles HR
    J Phys Act Health; 2012 Jan; 9 Suppl 1():S29-36. PubMed ID: 22287445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.
    Tate RL; McDonald S; Perdices M; Togher L; Schultz R; Savage S
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 18(4):385-401. PubMed ID: 18576270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing medical students' communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients' quality assurance.
    Shirazi M; Labaf A; Monjazebi F; Jalili M; Mirzazadeh M; Ponzer S; Masiello I
    Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Jun; 38(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 24777713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the Content and Quality in Briefs Instrument (CQB-I).
    Elf M; Engström MS; Wijk H
    HERD; 2012; 5(3):74-88. PubMed ID: 23002570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility of the use of a reliable and valid central venous catheter blood draw bundle checklist.
    Secola R; Lewis MA; Pike N; Needleman J; Doering L
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2012; 27(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 22269906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
    Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.
    Slim K; Nini E; Forestier D; Kwiatkowski F; Panis Y; Chipponi J
    ANZ J Surg; 2003 Sep; 73(9):712-6. PubMed ID: 12956787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development, inter-rater reliability and feasibility of a checklist to assess implementation (Ch-IMP) in systematic reviews: the case of provider-based prevention and treatment programs targeting children and youth.
    Cargo M; Stankov I; Thomas J; Saini M; Rogers P; Mayo-Wilson E; Hannes K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Sep; 15():73. PubMed ID: 26346461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.
    Deeks JJ; Dinnes J; D'Amico R; Sowden AJ; Sakarovitch C; Song F; Petticrew M; Altman DG; ;
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(27):iii-x, 1-173. PubMed ID: 14499048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.
    MacLehose RR; Reeves BC; Harvey IM; Sheldon TA; Russell IT; Black AM
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(34):1-154. PubMed ID: 11134917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and assessment of validity and reliability of a checklist to evaluate the Circulating and Scrub Skills of Operating Room Novices (CSSORN checklist).
    Nasiri M; Yektatalab S; Momennasab M; Vizeshfar F
    J Educ Health Promot; 2023; 12():65. PubMed ID: 37113409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.
    Mohammed Vashist N; Samaan M; Mosli MH; Parker CE; MacDonald JK; Nelson SA; Zou GY; Feagan BG; Khanna R; Jairath V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD011450. PubMed ID: 29338066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.
    Hartling L; Ospina M; Liang Y; Dryden DM; Hooton N; Krebs Seida J; Klassen TP
    BMJ; 2009 Oct; 339():b4012. PubMed ID: 19841007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assessment for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies.
    Qumseya BJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Feb; 93(2):486-494.e1. PubMed ID: 33068610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity.
    Kim SY; Park JE; Lee YJ; Seo HJ; Sheen SS; Hahn S; Jang BH; Son HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23337781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 132.