These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9764550)

  • 1. Evaluation of six commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Buchaille L; Freydière AM; Guinet R; Gille Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jul; 17(7):479-88. PubMed ID: 9764550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of four commercialized biochemical systems for clinical yeast identification by colour-producing reactions.
    Paugam A; Benchetrit M; Fiacre A; Tourte-Schaefer C; Dupouy-Camet J
    Med Mycol; 1999 Feb; 37(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10200929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are the Conventional Commercial Yeast Identification Methods Still Helpful in the Era of New Clinical Microbiology Diagnostics? A Meta-Analysis of Their Accuracy.
    Posteraro B; Efremov L; Leoncini E; Amore R; Posteraro P; Ricciardi W; Sanguinetti M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 53(8):2439-50. PubMed ID: 25994160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
    Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative performance of Fungichrom I, Candifast and API 20C Aux systems in the identification of clinically significant yeasts.
    Gündeş SG; Gulenc S; Bingol R
    J Med Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 50(12):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 11761197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auxacolor, a new commercial system for yeast identification: evaluation of 182 strains comparatively with ID 32C.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Lebeau B; Kervroedan P; Faure O; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1995; 53(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 7574109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Schuffenecker I; Freydière A; de Montclos H; Gille Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Apr; 12(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 8513813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of clinical yeasts by Vitek MS system compared with API ID 32 C.
    Durán-Valle MT; Sanz-Rodríguez N; Muñoz-Paraíso C; Almagro-Moltó M; Gómez-Garcés JL
    Med Mycol; 2014 May; 52(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 24782106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter evaluation of the new VITEK 2 advanced colorimetric yeast identification card.
    Hata DJ; Hall L; Fothergill AW; Larone DH; Wengenack NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):1087-92. PubMed ID: 17267631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Yeast identification in the clinical microbiology laboratory: phenotypical methods.
    Freydiere AM; Guinet R; Boiron P
    Med Mycol; 2001 Feb; 39(1):9-33. PubMed ID: 11270413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid identification of clinical yeast isolates using the colorimetric AUXACOLOR system.
    Romney MG; Bryce EA; Rennie RP; Sand CA
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 Feb; 36(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 10705057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix system for identification of a wide spectrum of clinically important yeast species: a comparison with Vitek 2-YST.
    Won EJ; Shin JH; Kim MN; Choi MJ; Joo MY; Kee SJ; Shin MG; Suh SP; Ryang DW
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Aug; 79(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 24952986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of three commercial identification systems using common and rare bloodstream yeast isolates.
    Meletiadis J; Arabatzis M; Bompola M; Tsiveriotis K; Hini S; Petinaki E; Velegraki A; Zerva L
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jul; 49(7):2722-7. PubMed ID: 21543578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simple, reliable, and cost-effective yeast identification scheme for the clinical laboratory.
    Koehler AP; Chu KC; Houang ET; Cheng AF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Feb; 37(2):422-6. PubMed ID: 9889232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the identification of medically-important yeasts in the clinical laboratories of Dijon and Lille hospitals.
    Sendid B; Ducoroy P; François N; Lucchi G; Spinali S; Vagner O; Damiens S; Bonnin A; Poulain D; Dalle F
    Med Mycol; 2013 Jan; 51(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 22703164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the auxacolor system for biochemical identification of medically important yeasts.
    Sheppard DC; deSouza E; Hashmi Z; Robson HG; René P
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Dec; 36(12):3726-7. PubMed ID: 9817909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.