These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9764550)

  • 21. Differentiation of yeast-like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system.
    Hantschke D
    Mycoses; 1996; 39(3-4):135-40. PubMed ID: 8767008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Evaluation of mass spectrometry for the identification of clinically interesting yeasts].
    Galán F; García-Agudo L; Guerrero I; Marín P; García-Tapia A; García-Martos P; Rodríguez-Iglesias M
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2015; 33(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 25444360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative evaluation of a commercial system for identification of Candida lusitaniae.
    Michel-Nguyen A; Favel A; Chastin C; Selva M; Regli P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 May; 19(5):393-5. PubMed ID: 10898145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Internal transcribed spacer sequencing versus biochemical profiling for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Ciardo DE; Schär G; Böttger EC; Altwegg M; Bosshard PP
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jan; 44(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 16390952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative performance of the RapID Yeast Plus System and the API 20C AUX Clinical Yeast System.
    Smith MB; Dunklee D; Vu H; Woods GL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Aug; 37(8):2697-8. PubMed ID: 10405424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pasteur yeasts system, a test-kit for yeasts identification. Its evaluation in comparison with three commercial methods and conventional procedures.
    Riviera L; Bellotti MG
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1988; 67(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 3242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of simplified and commercial systems for identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deák T; Beuchat LR
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 7(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 3079471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of six commercial tests and the germ-tube test for presumptive identification of Candida albicans.
    Hoppe JE; Frey P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Mar; 18(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 10357052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identification of yeast isolated from dermatological patients by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
    Seyfarth F; Wiegand C; Erhard M; Gräser Y; Elsner P; Hipler UC
    Mycoses; 2012 May; 55(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 21848605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinically relevant yeast species identified by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer region of r-RNA gene and Vitek 2 compact (YST card) commercial identification system: Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Assam, Northeast India.
    Nath R; Bora R; Borkakoty B; Saikia L; Parida P
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2017; 35(4):588-592. PubMed ID: 29405155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Evaluation of the API20C AUX system for the identification of clinically important yeasts].
    Silva JO; Candido RC
    Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2005; 38(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 15895181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improved clinical laboratory identification of human pathogenic yeasts by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
    Bader O; Weig M; Taverne-Ghadwal L; Lugert R; Gross U; Kuhns M
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2011 Sep; 17(9):1359-65. PubMed ID: 20946411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Automated method for yeast identification: ATB 32 C].
    Hernández-Molina JM; Coque MT; Campos E; Rando C; Leiva EF
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1992 May; 10(5):293-5. PubMed ID: 1391001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of Chromogenic Candida Agar for isolation and presumptive identification of pathogenic yeast species.
    Ghelardi E; Pichierri G; Castagna B; Barnini S; Tavanti A; Campa M
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2008 Feb; 14(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 17986267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Species identification of invasive yeasts including Candida in Pakistan: limitations of phenotypic methods.
    Farooqi J; Jabeen K; Saeed N; Zafar A; Brandt ME; Hasan R
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Oct; 62(10):995-8. PubMed ID: 23866432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the MicroScan enzyme-based system for the identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deak T; Beuchat LR
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1995 Oct; 79(4):439-46. PubMed ID: 7592137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simple strategy for direct identification of medically important yeast species from positive blood culture vials.
    Sheppard DC; René P; Harris AD; Miller MA; Laverdière M; deSouza E; Robson HG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):2040-1. PubMed ID: 10325374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Rapid identification and susceptibility to killer toxins of yeasts isolated from non-systemic mycoses].
    Sangorrín MP; Lopes CA; Rivero A; Caballero AC
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 2007; 39(4):230-6. PubMed ID: 18390160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
    Gutierrez J; Martin E; Lozano C; Coronilla J; Nogales C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 7856946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.