BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9764620)

  • 1. Maternal and infant complications in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery.
    Gregory KD; Henry OA; Ramicone E; Chan LS; Platt LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):507-13. PubMed ID: 9764620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience.
    Lipscomb KR; Gregory K; Shaw K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 7898833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
    Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elective cesarean section for macrosomia?
    Yan JS; Chang YK; Yin CS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1994 Mar; 53(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8174008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome.
    Bjørstad AR; Irgens-Hansen K; Daltveit AK; Irgens LM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 20235897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
    Rozenberg P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neonatal outcomes of macrosomic infants of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers.
    Cordero L; Paetow P; Landon MB; Nankervis CA
    J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2015; 8(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 26410433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Fetal macrosomia in Lubumbashi: risk factors and maternal and perinatal prognosis].
    Luhete PK; Mukuku O; Kiopin PM; Tambwe AM; Kayamba PK
    Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 23():166. PubMed ID: 27303582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk factors and outcomes of fetal macrosomia in a tertiary centre in Tanzania: a case-control study.
    Said AS; Manji KP
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16(1):243. PubMed ID: 27557930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies.
    Weissmann-Brenner A; Simchen MJ; Zilberberg E; Kalter A; Weisz B; Achiron R; Dulitzky M
    Med Sci Monit; 2012 Sep; 18(9):PH77-81. PubMed ID: 22936200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The combined effect of maternal obesity and fetal macrosomia on pregnancy outcomes.
    Gaudet L; Wen SW; Walker M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Sep; 36(9):776-784. PubMed ID: 25222356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Secular trends in cesarean delivery rates among macrosomic deliveries in the United States, 1989 to 2002.
    Boulet SL; Alexander GR; Salihu HM
    J Perinatol; 2005 Sep; 25(9):569-76. PubMed ID: 16079908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of labour and perinatal complications in case of foetus weight over 4000 g].
    Piasek G; Starzewski J; Chil A; Wrona-Cyranowska A; Gutowski J; Anisiewicz A; Pejas-Dembowska R; Malmur M; Krawczyk J; Rudziński R
    Wiad Lek; 2006; 59(5-6):326-31. PubMed ID: 17017476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Associated outcomes to fetal macrosomia: effect of maternal diabetes.
    Mallouli M; Derbel M; Ingrid A; Sahli J; Zedini C; Ajmi T; Mtiraoui A
    Tunis Med; 2017 Feb; 95(2):120-125. PubMed ID: 29424871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Beta J; Khan N; Khalil A; Fiolna M; Ramadan G; Akolekar R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):308-318. PubMed ID: 30938004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g.
    Bérard J; Dufour P; Vinatier D; Subtil D; Vanderstichèle S; Monnier JC; Puech F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Mar; 77(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 9550201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relations between maternal height, shoe size, and the success of vaginal delivery in birth weight over 4000 g.
    Naskovica K; Amdur Zilberfarb I; Lowenstein L; Frank Wolf M
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jan; 63(1):64-67. PubMed ID: 38216271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Labor and delivery outcomes among young adolescents.
    Torvie AJ; Callegari LS; Schiff MA; Debiec KE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 213(1):95.e1-95.e8. PubMed ID: 25935776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of a sonographic estimated fetal weight on the risk of cesarean delivery in macrosomic and small for gestational-age infants
    Matthews KC; Williamson J; Gupta S; Lam-Rachlin J; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A; Fox NS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 May; 30(10):1172-1176. PubMed ID: 27365115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: cohort study.
    Beta J; Khan N; Fiolna M; Khalil A; Ramadan G; Akolekar R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):319-325. PubMed ID: 30938000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.