505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9764636)
1. Evaluation of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology in private practice.
Nyirjesy I; Billingsley FS; Forman MR
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):601-7. PubMed ID: 9764636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Lorincz AT; Herrero R; Hutchinson ML; Bratti C; Zahniser D; Morales J; Hildesheim A; Helgesen K; Kelly D; Alfaro M; Mena F; Balmaceda I; Mango L; Greenberg M
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical value of digene hybrid capture HPV DNA testing in a referral-based population with abnormal pap smears.
Recio FO; Sahai Srivastava BI; Wong C; Hempling RE; Eltabbakh GH; Piver MS
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1998; 19(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9641214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with hybrid capture II: colposcopy and histologic human papillomavirus correlation.
Lonky NM; Felix JC; Naidu YM; Wolde-Tsadik G
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):481-9. PubMed ID: 12636951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reflex Human Papillomavirus Test Results as an Option for the Management of Korean Women With Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
Ryu KJ; Lee S; Min KJ; Kim JW; Hong JH; Song JY; Lee JK; Lee NW
Oncologist; 2015 Jun; 20(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 25964305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.
Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA
JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis.
Lonky NM; Navarre GL; Saunders S; Sadeghi M; Wolde-Tsadik G
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):716-20. PubMed ID: 7724102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeat cytology and human papillomavirus screening strategies in detecting preinvasive cervical lesions.
Li K; Yin R
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Feb; 94(5):e435. PubMed ID: 25654377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human papillomavirus testing in women with mild cytologic atypia.
Bergeron C; Jeannel D; Poveda J; Cassonnet P; Orth G
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):821-7. PubMed ID: 10831974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.
Arbyn M; Roelens J; Simoens C; Buntinx F; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PP; Prendiville WJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008054. PubMed ID: 23543559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].
Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
