153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9764690)
1. Natural history of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.
Melnikow J; Nuovo J; Willan AR; Chan BK; Howell LP
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 92(4 Pt 2):727-35. PubMed ID: 9764690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Lorincz AT; Herrero R; Hutchinson ML; Bratti C; Zahniser D; Morales J; Hildesheim A; Helgesen K; Kelly D; Alfaro M; Mena F; Balmaceda I; Mango L; Greenberg M
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up.
Stastny JF; Remmers RE; London WB; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Ryan M; Frable WJ
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in women over 55. Comparison with the general population and implications for management.
Rader AE; Rose PG; Rodriguez M; Mansbacher S; Pitlik D; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10349362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases.
Auger M; Charbonneau M; Arseneau J
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 9390122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization.
Sheils LA; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1065-72. PubMed ID: 9250300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of HIV infection on atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Duerr A; Paramsothy P; Jamieson DJ; Heilig CM; Klein RS; Cu-Uvin S; Schuman P; Anderson JR;
Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 42(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16477565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women.
Ahdieh-Grant L; Li R; Levine AM; Massad LS; Strickler HD; Minkoff H; Moxley M; Palefsky J; Sacks H; Burk RD; Gange SJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Jul; 96(14):1070-6. PubMed ID: 15265968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: the rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification.
Kurman RJ; Malkasian GD; Sedlis A; Solomon D
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):779-82. PubMed ID: 1849626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the treatment with β-glucan in women with cervical cytologic report of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (L-SIL).
Laccetta G; Carrone A; Burratti M; Mancino P
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Apr; 67(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 25668505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence and predictors of cervical dysplasia in patients with minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smears.
Kobelin MH; Kobelin CG; Burke L; Lavin P; Niloff JM; Kim YB
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 92(3):356-9. PubMed ID: 9721769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cytologically normal women and subsequent cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Liaw KL; Glass AG; Manos MM; Greer CE; Scott DR; Sherman M; Burk RD; Kurman RJ; Wacholder S; Rush BB; Cadell DM; Lawler P; Tabor D; Schiffman M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1999 Jun; 91(11):954-60. PubMed ID: 10359548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus lesions does not substantiate the biologic relevance of the Bethesda System.
Syrjänen K; Kataja V; Yliskoski M; Chang F; Syrjänen S; Saarikoski S
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 May; 79(5 ( Pt 1)):675-82. PubMed ID: 1314359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
