BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9765630)

  • 1. Creating a general practice national minimum data set: present possibility or future plan?
    Tilyard MW; Munro N; Walker SA; Dovey SM
    N Z Med J; 1998 Aug; 111(1072):317-8, 320. PubMed ID: 9765630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general practice minimum data set for New Zealand.
    Hall J; Tomlin A; Martin I; Tilyard M
    N Z Med J; 2002 Oct; 115(1163):U200. PubMed ID: 12552306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biases in estimates from the RNZCGP computer research group.
    Tilyard MW; Dovey SM; Spears GF
    N Z Med J; 1995 Apr; 108(997):118-21. PubMed ID: 7739817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The computer research network of the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners: an approach to general practice research in New Zealand.
    Dovey SM; Tilyard MW
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Dec; 46(413):749-52. PubMed ID: 8995859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wells S; Cooper A; Harvey M; Brew S; Wright M
    Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland.
    Whitelaw FG; Nevin SL; Milne RM; Taylor RJ; Taylor MW; Watt AH
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Mar; 46(404):181-6. PubMed ID: 8731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer.
    Pringle M; Ward P; Chilvers C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Oct; 45(399):537-41. PubMed ID: 7492423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-invasive methods for measuring data quality in general practice.
    Gribben B; Coster G; Pringle M; Simon J
    N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1125):30-2. PubMed ID: 11277472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerisation in Australian general practice.
    Western MC; Dwan KM; Western JS; Makkai T; Del Mar C
    Aust Fam Physician; 2003 Mar; 32(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 12666360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linking primary and secondary healthcare databases in New Zealand.
    Tomlin A; Hall J
    N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1191):U816. PubMed ID: 15107885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethnicity recording in general practice computer systems.
    Kumarapeli P; Stepaniuk R; de Lusignan S; Williams R; Rowlands G
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Sep; 28(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16840765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geographical variations in the organisation of general practice.
    Gribben B; Bonita R; Broad J; McAvoy B; Raymont A
    N Z Med J; 1995 Sep; 108(1007):361-3. PubMed ID: 7566774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medical care research based on family doctor routine data--are interface-communicated treatment data feasible?].
    Hummers-Pradier E; Simmenroth-Nayda A; Scheidt-Nave C; Scheer N; Fischer T; Niebling W; Kochen MM
    Gesundheitswesen; 2003 Feb; 65(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 12632320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internet use amongst New Zealand general practitioners.
    Eberhart-Phillips J; Hall K; Herbison GP; Jenkins S; Lambert J; Ng R; Nicholson M; Rankin L
    N Z Med J; 2000 Apr; 113(1108):135-7. PubMed ID: 10872432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerised information exchange in health care.
    Regan BG
    Med J Aust; 1991 Jan; 154(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 1986193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The General Practice Research Network: the capabilities of an electronic patient management system for longitudinal patient data.
    Sayer GP; McGeechan K; Kemp A; Bhasale A; Horn F; Hendrie L; Swan L; Scahill S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2003 Sep; 12(6):483-9. PubMed ID: 14513662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the possibility to classify patients according to cholesterol guideline screening criteria using routinely recorded electronic patient record data.
    Van Wyk JT; Van Wijk MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 93():39-46. PubMed ID: 15058412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health promotion and the use of Gpass in Scotland.
    Henderson BS; Taylor MW; Milne RM; Taylor RJ; Begg A; McEwan SR; Irving M
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1995 Sep; 53(5):253-9. PubMed ID: 7490195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The completeness and accuracy of patient record transfer between practices.
    Sullivan F; Wilson P
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1997 Jan; 55(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 9090174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.
    Hamilton WT; Round AP; Sharp D; Peters TJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Dec; 53(497):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 14960216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.