These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9766033)

  • 1. X-ray digital subtraction angiography to magnetic resonance-digital subtraction angiography using three-dimensional TRICKS. Historical perspective and computer simulations: a review.
    Mistretta CA; Grist TM
    Invest Radiol; 1998 Sep; 33(9):496-505. PubMed ID: 9766033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intraarterial and IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in pigs.
    Omary RA; Henseler KP; Unal O; Maciolek LJ; Finn JP; Li D; Nemcek AA; Vogelzang RL; Grist TM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 11756103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
    Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
    Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Grijalba FU; Esandi MC
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 20105092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hepatic blood supply: comparison of optimized dual phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Kopka L; Rodenwaldt J; Vosshenrich R; Fischer U; Renner B; Lorf T; Graessner J; Ringe B; Grabbe E
    Radiology; 1999 Apr; 211(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 10189453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hansmann J; Morelli JN; Michaely HJ; Riester T; Budjan J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1486-93. PubMed ID: 24338813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography.
    Andreisek G; Pfammatter T; Goepfert K; Nanz D; Hervo P; Koppensteiner R; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 17179394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.
    Chan YL; Leung CB; Yu SC; Yeung DK; Li PK
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11222071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of enlarged images using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography, and conventional angiography.
    Heo YC; Lee HK; Yang HJ; Cho JH
    J Med Syst; 2014 Dec; 38(12):146. PubMed ID: 25352491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of single-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in therapy indications in abdominal and iliac arteries.
    Schaefer PJ; Schaefer FK; Mueller-Huelsbeck S; Both M; Heller M; Jahnke T
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 17278036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Bongartz G; Jaeger K; Heidecker HG; Thalhammer C; Schulte AC; Hashagen C; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):901-8. PubMed ID: 16641335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of subtraction methods in three-dimensional contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography.
    Huang Y; Webster CA; Wright GA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 May; 15(5):541-50. PubMed ID: 11997895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
    De Cobelli F; Venturini M; Vanzulli A; Sironi S; Salvioni M; Angeli E; Scifo P; Garancini MP; Quartagno R; Bianchi G; Del Maschio A
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 10671583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
    Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
    Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique.
    Huber A; Heuck A; Baur A; Helmberger T; Waggershauser T; Billing A; Heiss M; Petsch R; Reiser M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1291-8. PubMed ID: 11044026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.