These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9766407)
1. Mid-trimester emergent cerclage: a ten year single institution review. Chasen ST; Silverman NS J Perinatol; 1998; 18(5):338-42. PubMed ID: 9766407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Amnioreduction in emergency cerclage with prolapsed membranes: comparison of two methods for reducing the membranes. Locatelli A; Vergani P; Bellini P; Strobelt N; Arreghini A; Ghidini A Am J Perinatol; 1999; 16(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 10355913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of second-trimester, emergency cervical cerclage in patients with no history of cervical incompetence. Lipitz S; Libshitz A; Oelsner G; Kokia E; Goldenberg M; Mashiach S; Schiff E Am J Perinatol; 1996 Oct; 13(7):419-22. PubMed ID: 8960611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cerclage in early pregnancy. Angel JL; Pietrantoni M; O'Brien WF; Knuppel RA J Perinatol; 1991 Sep; 11(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 1919825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage. Guzman ER; Forster JK; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 9819870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical dilation as a predictor of pregnancy outcome following emergency cerclage. Fortner KB; Fitzpatrick CB; Grotegut CA; Swamy GK; Murtha AP; Heine RP; Brown HL J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1884-8. PubMed ID: 22385390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Emergency cervical cerclage. Does the gestational age make a difference? Eskandar MA; Sobande AA; Damole IO; Bahar AM Saudi Med J; 2004 Aug; 25(8):1028-31. PubMed ID: 15322593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Emergency cerclage compared with bed rest for advanced cervical dilatation in pregnancy. Olatunbosun OA; al-Nuaim L; Turnell RW Int Surg; 1995; 80(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 8530237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of delayed absorbable suture v nonabsorbable suture for treatment of incompetent cervix. Abdelhak YE; Sheen JJ; Kuczynski E; Bianco A J Perinat Med; 1999; 27(4):250-2. PubMed ID: 10560075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pregnancy outcome after placement of 'rescue' Shirodkar cerclage. Ventolini G; Genrich TJ; Roth J; Neiger R J Perinatol; 2009 Apr; 29(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 19158805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients with a prior failed transvaginal cerclage: a comparison of obstetric outcomes with either transabdominal or transvaginal cerclage. Davis G; Berghella V; Talucci M; Wapner RJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):836-9. PubMed ID: 11035322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Emergency cervix cerclage in amniotic sac prolapse--a realistic option for prolonging pregnancy]. Hitschold T; Berle P; Gonser M Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2001; 205(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 11253731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perinatal outcome of triplet gestation: does prophylactic cerclage make a difference? Elimian A; Figueroa R; Nigam S; Verma U; Tejani N; Kirshenbaum N J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10338066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prophylactic cerclage in pregnancy. Effect in women with a history of conization. Zeisler H; Joura EA; Bancher-Todesca D; Hanzal E; Gitsch G J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):390-2. PubMed ID: 9252928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]