850 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9766588)
1. Long-term Doppler echocardiographic results of aortic or mitral valve replacement with Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS; Berggren HE; Larsson S; Roberts B; Wallentin I; Caidahl K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Oct; 116(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 9766588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement in the diagnosis of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction by transesophageal echocardiography.
Zabalgoitia M; Herrera CJ; Chaudhry FA; Calhoon JH; Mehlman DJ; O'Rourke RA
J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Sep; 2(5):595-603. PubMed ID: 8269173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with the Biocor valve in the aortic position: an 8-year experience.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Thiene G; Nesseris G; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jun; 127(6):1616-23. PubMed ID: 15173715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mid-term follow-up in patients with Biocor porcine bioprostheses.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G; Thiene G; Casarotto D
Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Jun; 10(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 12044432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intermediate results of isolated mitral valve replacement with a Biocor porcine valve.
Rizzoli G; Bottio T; Vida V; Nesseris G; Caprili L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Feb; 129(2):322-9. PubMed ID: 15678042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the Bioflo pericardial bioprosthesis.
Gonzalez-Juanatey JR; Garcia-Bengoechea JB; Vega M; Garcia-Acuna JM; Rubio J; Duran D; Sierra J; Gil M
J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):315-9; discussion 320. PubMed ID: 8269126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in patients requiring valve surgery: search for a 'gold standard'.
Cujec B; Welsh R; Aboguddah A; Reeder B
Can J Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 8(8):829-38. PubMed ID: 1423004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of bioprosthetic valve failure after 10 years.
Teoh KH; Ivanov J; Weisel RD; Daniel LB; Darcel IC; Rakowski H
Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV110-6. PubMed ID: 2225395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Valfré C; Talenti E; Guerra F; Thiene G; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 10-year experience with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
Mykén PS; Caidahl K; Larsson S; Berggren HE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 8000608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eleven years' experience with the Biocor stentless aortic bioprosthesis: clinical and hemodynamic follow-up with long-term relative survival rate.
Dellgren G; Eriksson MJ; Brodin LA; Rådegran K
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2002 Dec; 22(6):912-21. PubMed ID: 12467813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Bioprosthesis degeneration in the aortic and mitral valve position. Results and problems from the cardiosurgical viewpoint].
Antretter H; Cottogni M; Falbesoner C; Furtwängler W; Mair P; Falk M; Hutter J
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1993; 143(11):281-7. PubMed ID: 8212714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 10-year experience with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position.
Myken PS; Caidahl K; Larsson S; Berggren HE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jan; 4(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 7742992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to ten years.
Riess FC; Bader R; Cramer E; Hansen L; Kleijnen B; Wahl G; Wallrath J; Winkel S; Bleese N
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 83(4):1310-8. PubMed ID: 17383332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
