850 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9766588)
41. Echocardiographic assessment and preliminary clinical results after aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis.
Corbineau H; Lelong B; Langanay T; Verhoye JP; Leguerrier A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 11297203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in the mitral position: a 10-year follow up of St. Jude Medical and Biocor valves.
Demirag M; Kirali K; Omeroglu SN; Mansuroglu D; Akinci E; Ipek G; Berki T; Gürbüz A; Isik O; Yakut C
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11206772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Diagnosis and treatment of early bioprosthetic malfunction in the mitral valve position due to thrombus formation.
Butnaru A; Shaheen J; Tzivoni D; Tauber R; Bitran D; Silberman S
Am J Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 112(9):1439-44. PubMed ID: 23891426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.
Eric Jamieson WR; Marchand MA; Pelletier CL; Norton R; Pellerin M; Dubiel TW; Aupart MR; Daenen WJ; Holden MP; David TE; Ryba EA; Anderson WN
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Risk of reoperation for mitral bioprosthesis dysfunction.
Jaussaud N; Gariboldi V; Grisoli D; Berbis J; Kerbaul F; Riberi A; Collart F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Jan; 21(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 22474743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
Bernal JM; Rabasa JM; Cagigas JC; Echevarria JR; Carrion MF; Revuelta JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthesis: A Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Follow-Up.
Celiento M; Blasi S; De Martino A; Pratali S; Milano AD; Bortolotti U
Tex Heart Inst J; 2016 Feb; 43(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 27047280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Hemodynamic Deterioration of Surgically Implanted Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.
Salaun E; Mahjoub H; Dahou A; Mathieu P; Larose É; Després JP; Rodés-Cabau J; Arsenault BJ; Puri R; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(3):241-251. PubMed ID: 30012316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Rate, Timing, Correlates, and Outcomes of Hemodynamic Valve Deterioration After Bioprosthetic Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
Salaun E; Mahjoub H; Girerd N; Dagenais F; Voisine P; Mohammadi S; Yanagawa B; Kalavrouziotis D; Juni P; Verma S; Puri R; Coté N; Rodés-Cabau J; Mathieu P; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
Circulation; 2018 Sep; 138(10):971-985. PubMed ID: 30354532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of the freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis: the Tel Aviv Medical Center experience.
Schwartz AL; Topilsky Y; Uretzky G; Nesher N; Ben-Gal Y; Biner S; Keren G; Kramer A
Isr Med Assoc J; 2013 Sep; 15(9):470-6. PubMed ID: 24340835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of pregnancy after bioprosthetic valve replacement in young women: a prospective five-year study.
Avila WS; Rossi EG; Grinberg M; Ramires JA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):864-9. PubMed ID: 12479290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of an extended stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
Eriksson MJ; Brodin LA; Dellgren GN; Rådegran K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Nov; 6(6):653-60. PubMed ID: 9427138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old.
Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Wu Y; Wang L; Starr A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.
Hammermeister KE; Sethi GK; Henderson WG; Oprian C; Kim T; Rahimtoola S
N Engl J Med; 1993 May; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations.
Bourguignon T; Bouquiaux-Stablo AL; Loardi C; Mirza A; Candolfi P; Marchand M; Aupart MR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):2004-2011.e1. PubMed ID: 24667021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
