136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9766721)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils.
Husband JE; Padhani AR; MacVicar AD; Revell P
Clin Radiol; 1998 Sep; 53(9):673-81. PubMed ID: 9766721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil.
O'Donohoe RL; Dunne RM; Kimbrell V; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):1062-1069. PubMed ID: 30324501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal--pelvic phased-array coils.
Hricak H; White S; Vigneron D; Kurhanewicz J; Kosco A; Levin D; Weiss J; Narayan P; Carroll PR
Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):703-9. PubMed ID: 7972810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla.
Sosna J; Pedrosa I; Dewolf WC; Mahallati H; Lenkinski RE; Rofsky NM
Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):857-62. PubMed ID: 15354305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.
Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Jager GJ; Hartman RP; King BF; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 17024497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expandable and rigid endorectal coils for prostate MRI: impact on prostate distortion and rigid image registration.
Kim Y; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Noworolski SM; Vigneron DB; Kurhanewicz J
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3569-78. PubMed ID: 16475755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of image quality and patient discomfort in prostate MRI: pelvic phased array coil vs. endorectal coil.
Barth BK; Cornelius A; Nanz D; Eberli D; Donati OF
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2218-2226. PubMed ID: 27369051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of prostate cancer detection at 3-T MRI with and without an endorectal coil: A prospective, paired-patient study.
Costa DN; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Lenkinski RE; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Francis F; Travalini D; Pedrosa I
Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e7-255.e13. PubMed ID: 26971190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast spin-echo MR images of the pelvis obtained with a phased-array coil: value in localizing and staging prostatic carcinoma.
Kier R; Wain S; Troiano R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 8352116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate imaging: evaluation of a reusable two-channel endorectal receiver coil for MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Haider MA; Krieger A; Elliott C; Da Rosa MR; Milot L
Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):556-65. PubMed ID: 24471393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils; Initial experience(1).
Bloch BN; Rofsky NM; Baroni RH; Marquis RP; Pedrosa I; Lenkinski RE
Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):863-7. PubMed ID: 15288036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of prostate measurements on MRI with and without an endorectal coil.
Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Kurteva T; Ghavamian R; Rozenblit AM
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 25457525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation between external phased array coil at 3 T and endorectal coil at 1.5 T: preliminary results.
Torricelli P; Cinquantini F; Ligabue G; Bianchi G; Sighinolfi P; Romagnoli R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 16778606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]