These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9767224)
21. Medical interventions during pregnancy and childbirth. Rodgers ME Br J Nurs; 1998 Nov 26-Dec 9; 7(21):1341. PubMed ID: 10076211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High Court endorses women's right to refuse treatment. Pract Midwife; 1998 Jun; 1(6):7. PubMed ID: 9735814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Consent, compulsion and the rights of the mother and unborn child. Dimond B Midwives Chron; 1986 Apr; 99(1179):78-80. PubMed ID: 2939328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Sheila Kitzinger's letter from Europe: pregnant asylum seekers: the dispossessed. Kitzinger S Birth; 2004 Sep; 31(3):236-8. PubMed ID: 15330888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Legal aspects of consent 7: young persons of 16 and 17 years. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2001 Jun 14-27; 10(11):732-3. PubMed ID: 12048490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Sheila Kitzinger's letter from Europe: awake, aware--and action! Kitzinger S Birth; 2001 Sep; 28(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 11552971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Rossiter GP Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In re A.C. Bourke LH Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2279918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The rise and fall of children's consent to surgery. Alderson P Paediatr Nurs; 2000 Mar; 12(2):6-8. PubMed ID: 11220847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Court-authorised caesareans: new guidance. Health Care Anal; 1997 Sep; 5(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 10184767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Canadian Charter as a barrier to unwanted medical treatment of pregnant women in the interests of the foetus. Jackman M Health Law Can; 1993; 14(2):49-58. PubMed ID: 10131254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights. Noble-Allgire AM J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Sheila Kitzinger's letter from Europe: silence is collusion. Kitzinger S Birth; 2002 Sep; 29(3):207-9. PubMed ID: 12153653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Sheila Kitzinger's letter from Europe: the making of an obstetrician. Kitzinger S Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 17324184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy. Cahill H Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative analysis of the right of a pregnant woman to refuse medical treatment for herself and her viable fetus: the United States and United Kingdom. Glass BJ Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 2001; 11(2):507-41. PubMed ID: 12680376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The legal context of practice. 2: Consent and compromised capacity. Gajos MJ Ment Health Care; 1998 Mar; 1(7):239-42. PubMed ID: 9791427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Cesarean section and the rights of mother and child]. Ogasawara K Josanpu Zasshi; 1988 Jun; 42(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 3418964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]