These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9768063)
1. [Method of esthetic evaluation of the reconstructed breast after cancer. Report of 76 cases]. Fontet P; Schwarz J; Revol M; Banzet P; Servant JM Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1998 Jun; 43(3):217-21; discussion 222-3. PubMed ID: 9768063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm margins in 100 consecutive patients. Fedorcik GG; Sachs R; Goldfarb MA Breast J; 2006; 12(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 16684317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aesthetic outcome, patient satisfaction, and health-related quality of life in women at high risk undergoing prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Isern AE; Tengrup I; Loman N; Olsson H; Ringberg A J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1177-87. PubMed ID: 17938010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of the nipple projection after reconstruction with three different methods]. Richter DF; Reichenberger MA; Faymonville C Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2004 Dec; 36(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 15633081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of radiotherapy on capsule formation and aesthetic outcome after immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical expander implants. Behranwala KA; Dua RS; Ross GM; Ward A; A'hern R; Gui GP J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2006; 59(10):1043-51. PubMed ID: 16996426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation. Yueh JH; Houlihan MJ; Slavin SA; Lee BT; Pories SE; Morris DJ Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):586-90. PubMed ID: 19387167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Ueda S; Tamaki Y; Yano K; Okishiro N; Yanagisawa T; Imasato M; Shimazu K; Kim SJ; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S Surgery; 2008 Mar; 143(3):414-25. PubMed ID: 18291263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aesthetic breast reconstruction. Panettiere P; Marchetti L; Accorsi D; Del Gaudio GA Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2002; 26(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 12621565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection criteria for expander/implant breast reconstruction following radiation therapy. Parsa AA; Jackowe DJ; Johnson EW; Lye KD; Iwahira Y; Huynh TV; Pedro P; Pang J; Parsa FD Hawaii Med J; 2009 Apr; 68(3):66-8. PubMed ID: 19441617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): A new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Petit JY; Veronesi U; Orecchia R; Luini A; Rey P; Intra M; Didier F; Martella S; Rietjens M; Garusi C; DeLorenzi F; Gatti G; Leon ME; Casadio C Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Mar; 96(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16261402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit. Nano MT; Gill PG; Kollias J; Bochner MA; Carter N; Winefield HR ANZ J Surg; 2005 Jun; 75(6):445-53; discussion 371-2. PubMed ID: 15943735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Cardoso MJ; Cardoso J; Amaral N; Azevedo I; Barreau L; Bernardo M; Christie D; Costa S; Fitzal F; Fougo JL; Johansen J; Macmillan D; Mano MP; Regolo L; Rosa J; Teixeira L; Vrieling C Breast; 2007 Oct; 16(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 17606373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction. Alderman AK; Hawley ST; Waljee J; Morrow M; Katz SJ Cancer; 2007 May; 109(9):1715-20. PubMed ID: 17387715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlates of patient satisfaction and provider trust after breast-conserving surgery. Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK Cancer; 2008 Apr; 112(8):1679-87. PubMed ID: 18327801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aesthetic role of the surgically rebuilt inframammary fold for implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Bogetti P; Cravero L; Spagnoli G; Devalle L; Boriani F; Bocchiotti MA; Renditore S; Baglioni E J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(11):1225-32. PubMed ID: 17950185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate breast reconstruction with definitive anatomical implants after skin-sparing mastectomy. Salgarello M; Farallo E Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 58(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 15710117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of muscular contraction deformities with botulinum toxin type A after latissimus dorsi flap and sub-pectoral implant breast reconstruction. Figus A; Mazzocchi M; Dessy LA; Curinga G; Scuderi N J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Jul; 62(7):869-75. PubMed ID: 18411075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oncological safety and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Patani N; Devalia H; Anderson A; Mokbel K Surg Oncol; 2008 Aug; 17(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 18093828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tissue expansion after inverted-T mammaplasty: can it be performed successfully? Kilgo MS; Cordeiro PG; Disa JJ Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Jun; 50(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 12783005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]