109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9768429)
1. Landmark identification error in submentovertex cephalometrics. A computerized method for determining the condylar long axis.
Williamson PC; Major PW; Nebbe B; Glover KE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Sep; 86(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 9768429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A reliability comparison of submentovertex and zonographic methods of horizontal condylar angle estimation.
Benson BW; Frederiksen NL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Sep; 86(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 9768430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Head positioning and projection errors in submentovertex radiographic analysis.
Cheng AC; Lew KK; Bhole S
Singapore Dent J; 1997 Aug; 22(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10597171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cranial base foramen location accuracy and reliability in cone-beam computerized tomography.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e203-10. PubMed ID: 21392663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Landmark errors on posteroanterior cephalograms.
Ulkur F; Ozdemir F; Germec-Cakan D; Kaspar EC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 27476366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of condylar position from temporomandibular joint radiographs.
Aquilino SA; Matteson SR; Holland GA; Phillips C
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jan; 53(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 3856026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel 3-dimensional analysis to evaluate temporomandibular joint space and shape.
Ikeda R; Oberoi S; Wiley DF; Woodhouse C; Tallman M; Tun WW; McNeill C; Miller AJ; Hatcher D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Mar; 149(3):416-28. PubMed ID: 26926030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of horizontal condylar angle and x-ray projection angle on the appearance of the condyle on lateral temporomandibular joint panoramic radiographs.
Beloor Vasudeva S; Kameko N; Endo A; Okano T
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2012 Dec; 11(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 23208594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Panoramic imaging of the temporomandibular joint: an experimental study using cadaveric skulls.
Fallon SD; Fritz GW; Laskin DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 16413893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative and subjective analysis of temporomandibular joint radiographs.
Smith SR; Matteson SR; Phillips C; Tyndall DA
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 2585313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Submentovertex radiology: cephalometric considerations in temporomandibular dysfunction.
Maxwell MF; Farman AG; Haskell BS; Yancey JM
Cranio; 1995 Jan; 13(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 7585995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of condylar position changes: a test of validity of posteroanterior cephalometric and 20-degree lateral cephalometric techniques enhanced by digital subtraction.
Gilbert DB; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Bailey L; Phillips C
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 7751763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of the temporomandibular joint and adjacent cephalometric landmarks using a dual sensitivity screen-cassette system.
Hickman EW; Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Silviera A; Goldsmith J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):274-82. PubMed ID: 9161182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Axial temporomandibular joint morphology: a correlative study of radiographic and gross anatomic findings.
Ebner KA; Otis LL; Zakhary R; Danforth RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Feb; 69(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 2304751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification.
Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8678346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
