These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9768429)

  • 41. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Anatomical location of various condylar points for jaw movement analysis in Japanese women.
    Tokiwa H; Nakazawa F; Ozaki M; Nakamura Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 20074118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A method for quantifying positional change of the condyle on lateral tomograms by means of digital subtraction.
    Sato H; Ohki M; Kitamori H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 9687118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Random errors in localization of landmarks in postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Athanasiou AE; Miethke R; Van Der Meij AJ
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Dec; 26(4):273-84. PubMed ID: 10592154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Validity of digital subtraction of transcranial plain films in quantification of positional changes of the mandibular condyle.
    Tyndall DA; Phillips C; Malone-Trahey A; Renner J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jun; 71(6):748-55. PubMed ID: 2062527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Association between condylar position, joint morphology and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic patients without temporomandibular joint disorders.
    Kikuchi K; Takeuchi S; Tanaka E; Shibaguchi T; Tanne K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1070-5. PubMed ID: 14641670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Submentovertex cephalometric norms in male Chinese subjects.
    Lew KK; Tay DK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 8456782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Identification of condylar anatomy affects the evaluation of mandibular growth: guidelines for accurate reporting and research.
    Ghafari J; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Higgins-Barber K; Beideman RW; Shofer FS; Laster LL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jun; 109(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 8659475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
    Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
    Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
    Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Radiographic evaluation of condylar positioning in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.
    da Silva Félix Junior W; Klüppel LE; da Costa DJ; Fernandes Â; Scariot R; Rebellato NLB
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(4):419-423. PubMed ID: 28894931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Is orthopantomography reliable for TMJ diagnosis? An experimental study on a dry skull.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    J Orofac Pain; 1995; 9(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 8995908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Landmark identification in computerized posteroanterior cephalometrics.
    El-Mangoury NH; Shaheen SI; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Jan; 91(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 3467581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
    Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Validation of a novel semi-automated method for three-dimensional surface rendering of condyles using cone beam computed tomography data.
    Xi T; van Loon B; Fudalej P; Bergé S; Swennen G; Maal T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23528746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reliability of landmark identification for analysis of the temporomandibular joint in real-time MRI.
    Mouchoux J; Meyer-Marcotty P; Sojka F; Dechent P; Klenke D; Wiechens B; Quast A
    Head Face Med; 2024 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 38365709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Profile enhancement and cephalometric landmark identification.
    Burger HJ; Rossouw PE; Stander I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Mar; 105(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 8135208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Condylar repositioning in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with centric relation bite.
    Oh SM; Lee CY; Kim JW; Jang CS; Kim JY; Yang BE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 24(5):1535-8. PubMed ID: 24036721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.