These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9768505)

  • 1. Effects of variable-interval value and amount of training on stimulus generalization.
    Walker DJ; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Sep; 70(2):139-63. PubMed ID: 9768505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
    HEARST E; KORESKO MB; POPPEN R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 14218295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity.
    Ernst AJ; Engberg L; Thomas DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 5121854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus generalization of behavioral history: Interspecies generality and persistence of generalization gradients.
    Okouchi H; Nakamura S; Watanabe S; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Jul; 116(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 34105175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulus similarity in discrimination training upon wavelength generalization in pigeons.
    Tomie A; Davitt GA; Thomas DR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):945-54. PubMed ID: 1150957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus generalization and operant context renewal.
    Podlesnik CA; Miranda-Dukoski L
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():93-8. PubMed ID: 26241660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A further study of stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.
    THOMAS DR; WILLIAMS JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Apr; 6(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 13981054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of peak shift and behavioral contrast for autoshaped and operant behavior.
    Bushnell MC; Weiss SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):101-18. PubMed ID: 7365398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generalization of response patterns in a multiple peak procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():361-371. PubMed ID: 30048733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.
    Weiss SJ; Weissman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Mar; 57(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 1573370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG A LIGHT FLICKER RATE CONTINUUM AFTER DISCRIMINATION TRAINING WITH SEVERAL S-'S.
    SLOANE HN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 May; 7(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 14143907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task specificity in nonspecific transfer and in extradimensional stimulus generalization in pigeons.
    Rodgers JP; Thomas DR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Oct; 8(4):301-12. PubMed ID: 7175443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apparent movement and real movement detection in the pigeon: stimulus generalization.
    Siegel RK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 5166169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance to change varies inversely with reinforcement context.
    Grace RC; Arantes J; Berg ME
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22503966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination of methadone and cocaine by pigeons without explicit discrimination training.
    Schaal DW; McDonald MP; Miller MA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Sep; 66(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 8843690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.
    Cohen SL; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Sep; 56(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 1955817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of change-over-delay in the signal-key procedure].
    Manabe K; Kawashima T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Dec; 53(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 7169710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extinguished operant responding shows stimulus specificity.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Behav Processes; 2004 Mar; 65(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 14998658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some effects of discriminative training with equated frequency of reinforcement.
    Yarczower M; Gollub LR; Dickson JF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jul; 11(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 5672250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.