332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9768795)
1. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients.
Van Zundert AA; Fonck K; Al-Shaikh B; Mortier E
Anesthesiology; 2003 Nov; 99(5):1066-71. PubMed ID: 14576541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways in spontaneously ventilating adult patients.
Cao MM; Webb T; Bjorksten AR
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2004 Aug; 32(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 15675213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway.
Hanning SJ; McCulloch TJ; Orr B; Anderson SP
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2006 Apr; 34(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 16617647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Sudhir G; Redfern D; Hall JE; Wilkes AR; Cann C
Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):719-22. PubMed ID: 17567349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical comparison of the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask and the disposable Soft Seal mask in adult patients].
López AM; Valero R; Pons M; Salvador L; de Riva N; Gomar C
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2007 Oct; 54(8):462-8. PubMed ID: 17993094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the Soft Seal disposable and the Classic re-usable laryngeal mask airway.
Shafik MT; Bahlman BU; Hall JE; Ali MS
Anaesthesia; 2006 Feb; 61(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 16430570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; von Goedecke A; Keller C; Brimacombe L; Brimacombe M
Anesth Analg; 2004 Nov; 99(5):1560-1563. PubMed ID: 15502065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomised crossover trial comparing a single-use polyvinyl chloride laryngeal mask airway with a single-use silicone laryngeal mask airway.
Bell SF; Morris NG; Rao A; Wilkes AR; Goodwin N
Anaesthesia; 2012 Dec; 67(12):1337-42. PubMed ID: 23020699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial of silicone disposable laryngeal masks during anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing adult patients.
Williams DL; Wong SM; Pemberton EJ; Webb TG; Alexander KD
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Nov; 37(6):992-7. PubMed ID: 20014607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesth Analg; 1998 Dec; 87(6):1379-82. PubMed ID: 9842832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial.
Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Keller K
Anesth Analg; 1999 Nov; 89(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 10553855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
