These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9768901)

  • 21. Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem.
    Leopold SS; Berger RA; Rosenberg AG; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Aug; 81(8):1080-92. PubMed ID: 10466641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
    Duncan WW; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a roughened femoral stem: integrity of the stem-cement interface.
    Meneghini RM; Feinberg JR; Capello WN
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 12728421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results.
    Cannestra VP; Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1291-9. PubMed ID: 11005520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Peters CL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Higginbotham TO
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 11222897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical outcomes of cemented double-tapered titanium femoral stems: a minimum 5-year follow-up.
    Akiyama H; Kawanabe K; Yamamoto K; So K; Kuroda Y; Nakamura T
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Nov; 16(6):689-97. PubMed ID: 21922242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survivorship of femoral revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis.
    Hungerford MW; Hungerford DS; Khanuja HS; Pietryak BP; Jones LC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():126-30. PubMed ID: 17079378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Corrosion of cemented titanium femoral stems.
    Thomas SR; Shukla D; Latham PD
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 Sep; 86(7):974-8. PubMed ID: 15446521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A prospective study of a titanium femoral component for cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Tompkins GS; Lachiewicz PF; DeMasi R
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Dec; 9(6):623-30. PubMed ID: 7699375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cement-in-cement femoral revisions using a specially designed polished short revision stem; 24 consecutive stems followed for five to seven years.
    te Stroet MA; Moret-Wever SG; de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
    Hip Int; 2014; 24(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 24970322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new design of cemented stem using functionally graded materials (FGM).
    Hedia HS; Aldousari SM; Abdellatif AK; Fouda N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(3):1575-88. PubMed ID: 24840196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
    Sandiford NA; Jameson SS; Wilson MJ; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In-vitro characteristics of cemented titanium femoral stems with a smooth surface finish.
    Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Kaneuji A; Matsumoto T; Nakamura T
    J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jan; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22945910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
    Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Cnudde PH; Kärrholm J; Rolfson O; Timperley AJ; Mohaddes M
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. PubMed ID: 28363891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Revision total hip replacement using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components.
    Howie DW; Wimhurst JA; McGee MA; Carbone TA; Badaruddin BS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jul; 89(7):879-86. PubMed ID: 17673579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size.
    Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 14711952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs.
    D'Lima DD; Oishi CS; Petersilge WJ; Colwell CW; Walker RH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):140-8. PubMed ID: 9553546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.