These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9770252)

  • 1. On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.
    Piazza CC; Hanley GP; Fisher WW; Ruyter JM; Gulotta CS
    Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 9770252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape-maintained destructive behavior.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hanley GP; Remick ML; Contrucci SA; Aitken TL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):279-97; quiz 297-8. PubMed ID: 9210307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior.
    Fisher WW; O'Connor JT; Kurtz PF; DeLeon IG; Gotjen DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 10738954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus (instructional) fading during extinction of self-injurious escape behavior.
    Pace GM; Iwata BA; Cowdery GE; Andree PJ; McIntyre T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 8331017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A brief method for conducting a negative-reinforcement assessment.
    Zarcone JR; Crosland K; Fisher WW; Worsdell AS; Herman K
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 10198942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Altering the timing of academic prompts to treat destructive behavior maintained by escape.
    Ebanks ME; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 14596576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirically derived consequences: a data-based method for prescribing treatments for destructive behavior.
    Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Langdon NA
    Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 8085030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
    Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
    Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.
    Vollmer TR; Marcus BA; Ringdahl JE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 7706146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the properties of attention as reinforcement for destructive and appropriate behavior.
    Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Contrucci SA; Delia MD; Adelinis JD; Goh HL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 10641299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The establishing effects of client location on self-injurious behavior.
    Adelinis JD; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hanley GP
    Res Dev Disabil; 1997; 18(5):383-91. PubMed ID: 9292931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noncontingent reinforcement: effects of satiation versus choice responding.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; DeLeon IG; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE; Rodriguez-Catter V; Adelinis JD
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(6):411-27. PubMed ID: 10641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining.
    Lalli JS; Casey S; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 7592143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction.
    Fisher WW; Greer BD; Querim AC; DeRosa N
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2614-23. PubMed ID: 25036315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further investigation of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction for escape-maintained destructive behavior.
    Briggs AM; Dozier CL; Lessor AN; Kamana BU; Jess RL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Oct; 52(4):956-973. PubMed ID: 31642525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of various forms of reinforcement with and without extinction as treatment for escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Carter SL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(3):543-6. PubMed ID: 21358917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury.
    Mazaleski JL; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR; Smith RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 8331012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.