These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9771050)

  • 1. [Biocompatibility--the compatibility between a technical and a biological system].
    Bickel M
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1998; 108(9):858-64. PubMed ID: 9771050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Salivary glands as test object for assessment of biological compatibility in dentistry.
    Denisov AB
    Bull Exp Biol Med; 2001 Feb; 131(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 11391384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A critical note on bioceramics].
    Corvo G; Cattaneo V; Ruggeri B; Garau V; Tartaro GP; Santoro V
    Minerva Stomatol; 1994 Jun; 43(6):273-8. PubMed ID: 7935278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biological properties of the materials used in conservative dentistry. III. Materials for coronal reconstruction].
    Miani C; Deli R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1984; 33(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 6584730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [An experimental study of the tissue compatibility of titanium implants coated with hydroxyapatite and aluminum oxide by plasma spraying].
    Frolov AG; Triandafillidis S; Novikov SV; Fedorov SIu; Karasev MV; Tsimbalistov AV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1995; 74(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 7570708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Dental filling material biocompatibility--is Amalgam the worst in supply?].
    Zimmerli B
    Rev Med Suisse; 2012 Jan; 8(325):195-6. PubMed ID: 22338513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Restorative dentistry: materials and biocompatibility. The congress of the Société Suisse d'Odonto-Stomatologie in Interlaken of 29-31 May 1997].
    Vauthier T
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1997; 107(12):1127-8. PubMed ID: 9471717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [5. Biological compatibility of model cast prostheses from the viewpoint of the material].
    Zukunft D
    Zahntechnik (Berl); 1980 May; 21(5):198-202. PubMed ID: 7008441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Restorative dentistry and biocompatibility. The congress of the Société Suisse d'Odonto-Stomatologie of 29 to 31 May 1997 at Interlaken].
    Vauthier T
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1997; 107(11):1053-4. PubMed ID: 9463221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening tests for sensitization potential of dental materials.
    Warfvinge G
    J Dent; 1994; 22 Suppl 2():S16-20. PubMed ID: 7844270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A model of an in vitro biological assay controlled by immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy].
    Seux D; Regad C; Magloire H; Holz J
    J Biol Buccale; 1991 Jun; 19(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 1939037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Substitute model for in-vitro biological testing. II. Quantitative evaluation of the biocompatibility of dental products].
    Regad C; Neroni M; Christen O; Thoenen S; Holz J
    J Biol Buccale; 1989 Dec; 17(4):285-95. PubMed ID: 2613702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical technique and biomaterials selection.
    Sadan A
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Sep; 36(8):591. PubMed ID: 16161460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [New proven materials, systems and technologies].
    Wirz J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1998; 108(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 9543792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Biological properties of materials in conservative dentistry. I. Pulp reactivity].
    Miani C; Deli R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1983; 32(6):879-81. PubMed ID: 6366506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Materials science: biological aspects.
    Schmalz G
    J Dent Res; 2002 Oct; 81(10):660-3. PubMed ID: 12351661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of basic dental materials on indicators of free radical oxidation and antioxidant blood`s potential of white rats (experimental study)].
    Kuz VS; Dvornyk VN; Kostenko VA; Kuz GM; Akimov OY
    Wiad Lek; 2018; 71(2 pt 2):318-322. PubMed ID: 29786578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The adverse effects of dental restorative materials--a review.
    Mongkolnam P
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Oct; 37(5):360-7. PubMed ID: 1444957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Substitute model of an in-vitro biological trials. I. Standardized method using human pulp cells].
    Christen O; Regad C; Neroni M; Thoenen S; Holz J
    J Biol Buccale; 1989 Dec; 17(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 2613701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Biocompatibility of dental materials: Part 2. Materials with mucosal contact].
    Klötzer WT; Reuling N
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Aug; 45(8):437-42. PubMed ID: 2269166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.