These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [The first school for x-ray laboratory assistants at the A. N. Bakulev Research Center of Cardiovascular Surgery]. Nizovtsova LA Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2013; (6):73-6. PubMed ID: 25702447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography. Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The measurement of the dynamic range of digital systems for visualizing x-ray images]. Kozlovskiĭ EB Med Tekh; 2000; (5):26-8. PubMed ID: 11076361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Streaking in a darkroom. Hearty C; Peart O Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):572. PubMed ID: 18650536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. If plain-film x-ray loses money, why go digital? Bell RA Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D13-5. PubMed ID: 10724729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States. Platin E Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography]. Gorelik FG Med Tekh; 2000; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Trends in x-ray examination frequency--film utilization in diagnostic radiology]. Angerstein W Rofo; 2008 Jun; 180(6):503-4. PubMed ID: 18504663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems. Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Use of blue and green systems of image visualization in roentgenology]. Riuduger IuG Med Tekh; 2004; (6):40-5. PubMed ID: 15656416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system. Morin RL; Seibert JA J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department. Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Analysis of the advantages of digital X-ray apparatuses over film X-ray apparatuses]. Elinson MB Med Tekh; 2005; (5):37-9. PubMed ID: 16285246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis. Brocklebank LM Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation. Busch HP; Faulkner K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital radiography: state of the art. Otis L; Mupparapu M; Mozaffari E Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 2000; 67(6):33-4, 42-3. PubMed ID: 11411340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]