These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9771453)

  • 1. The effect of four interventions on the informational content of histopathology reports of resected colorectal carcinomas.
    Cross SS; Feeley KM; Angel CA
    J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jun; 51(6):481-2. PubMed ID: 9771453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Histopathology reporting in colorectal cancer: a proforma improves quality.
    Siriwardana PN; Pathmeswaran A; Hewavisenthi J; Deen KI
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Oct; 11(8):849-53. PubMed ID: 19740157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
    Bull AD; Biffin AH; Mella J; Radcliffe AG; Stamatakis JD; Steele RJ; Williams GT
    J Clin Pathol; 1997 Feb; 50(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 9155695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Template reporting matters--a nationwide study on histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections.
    Haugland HK; Casati B; Dørum LM; Bjugn R
    Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20869747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
    Rigby K; Brown SR; Lakin G; Balsitis M; Hosie KB
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Nov; 81(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 10655894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.
    Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An audit comparing the reporting of staging MRI scans for rectal cancer with the London Cancer Alliance (LCA) guidelines.
    Siddiqui MRS; Shanmuganandan AP; Rasheed S; Tekkis P; Brown G; Abulafi AM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2093-2104. PubMed ID: 28947340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence of effectiveness of clinical audit in improving histopathology reporting standards of mastectomy specimens.
    Appleton MA; Douglas-Jones AG; Morgan JM
    J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jan; 51(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9577368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structured electronic template for histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections: five-year follow-up shows sustainable long-term quality improvement.
    Casati B; Bjugn R
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jun; 136(6):652-6. PubMed ID: 22646273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histopathological report of colorectal carcinoma resections: A 5-year audit in Lagos.
    Badmos KB; Rotimi O; Lawal AO; Osinowo AO; Habeebu MY; Abdulkareem FB
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2018; 25(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 29676343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Completeness of low anterior resection pathology report: a hospital-based audit with recommendations on improving reporting.
    Nambiar A; Vivek N; Bindu MR; Sudheer OV; Bai L
    Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 20448379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma--a comparative study.
    Beattie GC; McAdam TK; Elliott S; Sloan JM; Irwin ST
    Colorectal Dis; 2003 Nov; 5(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 14617240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of a standard proforma in breast cancer reporting.
    Mathers ME; Shrimankar J; Scott DJ; Charlton FG; Griffith CD; Angus B
    J Clin Pathol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):809-11. PubMed ID: 11577136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structured electronic template for histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas: a joint project by the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Society for Pathology.
    Bjugn R; Casati B; Norstein J
    Hum Pathol; 2008 Mar; 39(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 18187180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathology reporting of resected colorectal cancers in New South Wales in 2000.
    Chapuis PH; Chan C; Lin BP; Armstrong K; Armstrong B; Spigelman AD; O'Connell D; Leong D; Dent OF
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Nov; 77(11):963-9. PubMed ID: 17931258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.
    Jha MK; Corbett WA; Wilson RG; Koreli A; Papagrigoriadis S
    Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 17159746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Improving the quality of histopathological examination of colorectal cancer specimens through standard protocol implementation].
    Ihnát P; Delongová P; Dvořáčková J; Horáček J; Vávra P; Martínek L; Guňková P; Pelikán A; Zonča P
    Rozhl Chir; 2013 Dec; 92(12):703-7. PubMed ID: 24479515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lymph node preparation in resected colorectal carcinoma specimens employing the acetone clearing method.
    Vogel C; Kirtil T; Oellig F; Stolte M
    Pathol Res Pract; 2008; 204(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18023994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the interaction between the ophthalmology and histopathology departments.
    Maudgil A; Salvi SM; Tan JH; Mudhar HS
    Eye (Lond); 2011 Aug; 25(8):998-1004. PubMed ID: 21587272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined.
    Cianchi F; Palomba A; Boddi V; Messerini L; Pucciani F; Perigli G; Bechi P; Cortesini C
    World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 11865379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.