These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9771573)

  • 21. Venous saturation slab causes overestimation of stenosis length in two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.
    Wikström J; Bjornerud A; McGill S; Johansson L
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jan; 50(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19052937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamically scaled phantom phase contrast MRI compared to true-scale computational modeling of coronary artery flow.
    Beier S; Ormiston JA; Webster MW; Cater JE; Norris SE; Medrano-Gracia P; Young AA; Cowan BR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):983-92. PubMed ID: 27042817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of Reynolds stress components and turbulent pressure loss using 4D flow MRI with extended motion encoding.
    Haraldsson H; Kefayati S; Ahn S; Dyverfeldt P; Lantz J; Karlsson M; Laub G; Ebbers T; Saloner D
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):1962-1971. PubMed ID: 28745409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simulation of phase contrast MRI of turbulent flow.
    Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Gårdhagen R; Karlsson M; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Oct; 64(4):1039-46. PubMed ID: 20574963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A novel phase-corrected 3D cine ultra-short te (UTE) phase-contrast MRI technique.
    Kadbi M; Wang H; Negahdar M; Warner L; Traughber M; Martin P; Amini AA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():77-81. PubMed ID: 23365836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The accuracy of magnetic resonance phase velocity measurements in stenotic flow.
    Siegel JM; Oshinski JN; Pettigrew RI; Ku DN
    J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1665-72. PubMed ID: 8945670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of Transitional and Turbulent Flow Through the FDA Benchmark Nozzle Model Using Laser Doppler Velocimetry.
    Taylor JO; Good BC; Paterno AV; Hariharan P; Deutsch S; Malinauskas RA; Manning KB
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2016 Sep; 7(3):191-209. PubMed ID: 27350137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Numerical and experimental assessment of turbulent kinetic energy in an aortic coarctation.
    Lantz J; Ebbers T; Engvall J; Karlsson M
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1851-8. PubMed ID: 23746596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Regularization of flow streamlines in multislice phase-contrast MR imaging.
    Fatouraee N; Amini AA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jun; 22(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 12872945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study.
    Fürst G; Hofer M; Sitzer M; Kahn T; Müller E; Mödder U
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 7560312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Time-resolved DPIV investigation of pulsatile flow in symmetric stenotic arteries--effects of phase angle.
    Karri S; Vlachos PP
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Mar; 132(3):031010. PubMed ID: 20459198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images.
    Evans AJ; Blinder RA; Herfkens RJ; Spritzer CE; Kuethe DO; Fram EK; Hedlund LW
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Jul; 23(7):512-8. PubMed ID: 3170139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding.
    Schubert T; Bieri O; Pansini M; Stippich C; Santini F
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 24300842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Velocity profiles in stenosed models using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rittgers SE; Fei DY; Kraft KA; Fatouros PP
    Monogr Atheroscler; 1990; 15():43-53. PubMed ID: 2136929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On MRI turbulence quantification.
    Dyverfeldt P; Gårdhagen R; Sigfridsson A; Karlsson M; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 27(7):913-22. PubMed ID: 19525079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rethinking turbulence in blood.
    Antiga L; Steinman DA
    Biorheology; 2009; 46(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19458411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimization of MR phase-contrast-based flow velocimetry and shear stress measurements.
    Kim T; Seo JH; Bang SS; Choi HW; Chang Y; Lee J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():133-42. PubMed ID: 20039134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laminar-to-turbulent transition in pulsatile flow through a stenosis.
    Mallinger F; Drikakis D
    Biorheology; 2002; 39(3-4):437-41. PubMed ID: 12122264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Bayesian model for highly accelerated phase-contrast MRI.
    Rich A; Potter LC; Jin N; Ash J; Simonetti OP; Ahmad R
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Aug; 76(2):689-701. PubMed ID: 26444911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Turbulent Kinetic Energy Measurement Using Phase Contrast MRI for Estimating the Post-Stenotic Pressure Drop: In Vitro Validation and Clinical Application.
    Ha H; Kim GB; Kweon J; Huh HK; Lee SJ; Koo HJ; Kang JW; Lim TH; Kim DH; Kim YH; Kim N; Yang DH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151540. PubMed ID: 26978529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.