These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9771718)

  • 1. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
    Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
    Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
    Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
    Somiari SB; Shriver CD; He J; Parikh K; Jordan R; Hooke J; Hu H; Deyarmin B; Lubert S; Malicki L; Heckman C; Somiari RI
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 15571796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
    Rao PH
    Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-resolution analysis of genomic copy number alterations in bladder cancer by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Hurst CD; Fiegler H; Carr P; Williams S; Carter NP; Knowles MA
    Oncogene; 2004 Mar; 23(12):2250-63. PubMed ID: 14968109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Array-CGH and multipoint FISH to decode complex chromosomal rearrangements.
    Darai-Ramqvist E; Diaz de Ståhl T; Sandlund A; Mantripragada K; Klein G; Dumanski J; Imreh S; Kost-Alimova M
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():330. PubMed ID: 17196103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances.
    Solinas-Toldo S; Lampel S; Stilgenbauer S; Nickolenko J; Benner A; Döhner H; Cremer T; Lichter P
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Dec; 20(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 9408757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening of genomic imbalances in glioblastoma multiforme using high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization.
    Vranová V; Necesalová E; Kuglík P; Cejpek P; Pesáková M; Budínská E; Relichová J; Veselská R
    Oncol Rep; 2007 Feb; 17(2):457-64. PubMed ID: 17203188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple specific pattern of chromosomal aberrations at early stages of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: PIK3CA but not p63 gene as a likely target of 3q26-qter gains.
    Redon R; Muller D; Caulee K; Wanherdrick K; Abecassis J; du Manoir S
    Cancer Res; 2001 May; 61(10):4122-9. PubMed ID: 11358835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
    Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
    Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic signatures of chromosomal instability and osteosarcoma progression detected by high resolution array CGH and interphase FISH.
    Selvarajah S; Yoshimoto M; Ludkovski O; Park PC; Bayani J; Thorner P; Maire G; Squire JA; Zielenska M
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 122(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 18931480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.
    Buffart TE; Israeli D; Tijssen M; Vosse SJ; Mrsić A; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):994-1004. PubMed ID: 18663753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA copy-number analysis of the 22q11 deletion-syndrome region using array-CGH with genomic and PCR-based targets.
    Mantripragada KK; Tapia-Páez I; Blennow E; Nilsson P; Wedell A; Dumanski JP
    Int J Mol Med; 2004 Feb; 13(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 14719134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-resolution chromosome arm 5p array CGH analysis of small cell lung carcinoma cell lines.
    Coe BP; Henderson LJ; Garnis C; Tsao MS; Gazdar AF; Minna J; Lam S; Macaulay C; Lam WL
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2005 Mar; 42(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 15611929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of chromosomal imbalances in children with idiopathic mental retardation by array based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH).
    Schoumans J; Ruivenkamp C; Holmberg E; Kyllerman M; Anderlid BM; Nordenskjöld M
    J Med Genet; 2005 Sep; 42(9):699-705. PubMed ID: 16141005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The genetic differences between gallbladder and bile duct cancer cell lines.
    Saito S; Ghosh M; Morita K; Hirano T; Miwa M; Todoroki T
    Oncol Rep; 2006 Nov; 16(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17016576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic profiling of chromosome 1 in breast cancer: mapping of regions of gains and losses and identification of candidate genes on 1q.
    Orsetti B; Nugoli M; Cervera N; Lasorsa L; Chuchana P; Rougé C; Ursule L; Nguyen C; Bibeau F; Rodriguez C; Theillet C
    Br J Cancer; 2006 Nov; 95(10):1439-47. PubMed ID: 17060936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gain at chromosomal region 5p15.33, containing TERT, is the most frequent genetic event in early stages of non-small cell lung cancer.
    Kang JU; Koo SH; Kwon KC; Park JW; Kim JM
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Apr; 182(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18328944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative genomic hybridization.
    Pinkel D; Albertson DG
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2005; 6():331-54. PubMed ID: 16124865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 82.