These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9771983)

  • 21. Patch testing with nickel sulfate versus nickel chloride.
    Räsänen L; Mattila U; Kalimo K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 May; 40(5):287-8. PubMed ID: 10344493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Positive nickel patch tests do not intensify positive reactions to adjacent patch tests with dichromate. Results from a double-blind multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Brasch J; Kreilgård B; Henseler T; Aberer W; Fuchs T; Pflüger R; Hoeck U; Gefeller O
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Sep; 43(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 10985630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patch testing with nickel sulfate: comparison between 2 nickel sulfate preparations and 2 different test sites on the back.
    Simonetti V; Manzini BM; Seidenari S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Oct; 39(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 9817224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of new allergens and non-irritant patch test preparations.
    Wahlberg JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Sep; 39(3):155-6. PubMed ID: 9772008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An arm immersion model of compromised skin (II). Influence on minimal eliciting patch test concentrations of nickel.
    Allenby CF; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Mar; 28(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 8462286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Repeated open application tests (ROAT) in patients allergic to colophony--evaluated visually and with bioengineering techniques.
    Färm G
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Mar; 78(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 9534892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-reactivity between nickel and palladium demonstrated by systemic administration of nickel.
    Hindsén M; Spirén A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jul; 53(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 15982224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prevention of nickel-induced allergic contact reactions with pentoxifylline.
    Saricaoğlu H; Tunali S; Bülbül E; White IR; Palali Z
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 9840261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pretreatment of the test area with 1-day occlusion improves the response rate to NiSO4 5% pet. patch tests in subjects with a positive history of nickel allergy.
    Seidenari S; Manzini BM; Belletti B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Sep; 33(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 8565454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nickel chloride or nickel sulfate? Irritation from patch-test preparations as assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry.
    Wahlberg JE
    Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 2406063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiple sensitivities to transition metals: the nickel palladium reactions.
    Santucci B; Cannistraci C; Cristaudo A; Picardo M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Nov; 35(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 9007373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. False-positive "poral" cobalt patch test reactions reside in the eccrine acrosyringium.
    Storrs FJ; White CR
    Cutis; 2000 Jan; 65(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10664877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The reproducibility of nickel, cobalt and chromate sensitization in patients tested at least twice in the period 1992-2014 with TRUE Test®.
    Schaeffer AC; Andersen KE; Bindslev-Jensen C; Mortz CG
    Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Aug; 75(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 27385519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nickel: the search for alternative, optimal and non-irritant patch test preparations: Assessment based on laser Doppler flowmetry.
    E Wahlberg J
    Skin Res Technol; 1996 Aug; 2(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 27327389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Positive strip patch test reactions with coexistent negative patch test reactions. Relevance for the assessment practice of occupational skin disease].
    Scola N; Hunzelmann N; Ruzicka T; Kobus S; Adamek E; Altmeyer P; Dickel H
    Hautarzt; 2010 Dec; 61(12):1056-60. PubMed ID: 20664991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Allergic and irritant skin reactions evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry.
    Staberg B; Serup J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Jan; 18(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 2964989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment (protopic) reverses nickel contact dermatitis elicited by allergen challenge to a similar degree to mometasone furoate 0.1% with greater suppression of late erythema.
    Alomar A; Puig L; Gallardo CM; Valenzuela N
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Oct; 49(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 14996065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pre-treatment of nickel test areas with sodium lauryl sulfate detects nickel sensitivity in subjects reacting negatively to routinely performed patch tests.
    Seidenari S; Motolese A; Belletti B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Feb; 34(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 8681564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging for the documentation of flare-up in contact allergy to gold.
    Möller H; Björkner B; Bruze M; Lundqvist K; Wollmer P
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 10475510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A proposed relevance scoring system for positive allergic patch test reactions: practical implications and limitations.
    Lachapelle JM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jan; 36(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 9034686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.