These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9772407)

  • 21. Pelvimetry revisited: analyzing cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Lenhard MS; Johnson TR; Weckbach S; Nikolaou K; Friese K; Hasbargen U
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):e107-11. PubMed ID: 19443160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The sonographic measurement of the ratio between the fetal head circumference and the obstetrical conjugate is accurate in predicting the risk of labor arrest: results from a multicenter prospective study.
    Di Pasquo E; Morganelli G; Volpe N; Labadini C; Ramirez Zegarra R; Abou-Dakn M; Mappa I; Rizzo G; Dall'Asta A; Ghi T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Nov; 4(6):100710. PubMed ID: 35964934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The magnetic resonance imaging-based fetal-pelvic index: a pilot study in the community hospital.
    Fox LK; Huerta-Enochian GS; Hamlin JA; Katz VL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1679-85; discussion 1685-8. PubMed ID: 15284768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance pelvimetry: A new technique for evaluating the female pelvis in pregnancy.
    Liao KD; Yu YH; Li YG; Chen L; Peng C; Liu P; Chen CL; Chen RY; Zhong M; Wang Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():208-212. PubMed ID: 29685537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index as a predictor of fetal-pelvic disproportion in women with abnormal labor patterns that require labor augmentations.
    Thurnau GR; Morgan MA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Nov; 159(5):1168-72. PubMed ID: 3056002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Obstetrical prognosis by x-ray pelvimetry].
    Fermandzhieva N; Georgiev I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1991; 30(2):6-10. PubMed ID: 1883050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The utilization and efficacy of pelvimetry.
    Kelly KM; Madden DA; Arcarese JS; Barnett M; Brown RF
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1975 Sep; 125(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 1200222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The diagnostic accuracy of pelvic measurements: threshold values and fetal size.
    Korhonen U; Taipale P; Heinonen S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):643-8. PubMed ID: 24816688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vaginosonographical determination of the true conjugate and the transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet.
    Deutinger J; Bernaschek G
    Arch Gynecol; 1987; 240(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 3300574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia.
    Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thoms and modified Ball methods with manual pelvimetry.
    Fine EA; Bracken M; Berkowitz RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 137(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 7369283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Detection of cephalopelvic disproportion using a virtual reality model: a feasibility study of three cases].
    Ami O; Chabrot P; Jardon K; Rocas D; Delmas V; Boyer L; Mage G
    J Radiol; 2011 Jan; 92(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21352725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. X-ray pelvimetry: helpful or harmful?
    Anderson N
    J Fam Pract; 1983 Sep; 17(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 6886643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Intrapartum sonographic study in clinical suspicion of cephalopelvic disproportion].
    Heidegger H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(22):1387-92. PubMed ID: 3324564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors related to the increasing cesarean section rates for cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Silbar EL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 May; 154(5):1095-8. PubMed ID: 3706435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Relation between Head Circumference and Mid-Pelvic Circumference: A Simple Index for Cephalopelvic Disproportion Evaluation.
    Liberty G; Gemer O; Siyanov I; Anteby EY; Apter A; Cohen SM; Bord I; Yagel S
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2021; 48(11-12):840-848. PubMed ID: 34879366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Foetal quality preserved in cephalopelvic disproportion in the primigravida.
    Philpott RH
    S Afr Med J; 1973 Oct; 47(42):2021-5. PubMed ID: 4755014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. X-ray pelvimetry-reappraisal.
    Nasrat H; Warda A
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1991; 18(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 2054947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Floating fetal head in primiparas at term.
    Chen HY; Huang MF; Tsai TJ; Sheu JC; Wu MD
    Int Surg; 1982; 67(4 Suppl):521-4. PubMed ID: 7183636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index in patients requiring labor induction.
    Morgan MA; Thurnau GR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):621-5. PubMed ID: 3048100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.