These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9773689)

  • 21. Incidence of the boundary condition between bone and soft tissue in a finite element model of a transfemoral amputee.
    Ramírez JF; Vélez JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Dec; 36(4):405-14. PubMed ID: 22354886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finite-element analysis to determine effect of monolimb flexibility on structural strength and interaction between residual limb and prosthetic socket.
    Lee WC; Zhang M; Boone DA; Contoyannis B
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004; 41(6A):775-86. PubMed ID: 15685466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Method for the design and analysis of a non-linear anisotropic lower limb prosthetic socket.
    Soh AK; Soh CK; Lau WS
    J Biomed Eng; 1990 Nov; 12(6):470-6. PubMed ID: 2266742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of Gait Cycle Loads on Stress Distribution at The Residual Limb/Socket Interface of Transfemoral Amputees: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Henao SC; Orozco C; Ramírez J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4985. PubMed ID: 32193432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1-population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling.
    Steer JW; Worsley PR; Browne M; Dickinson AS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1331-1346. PubMed ID: 31256276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finite element analysis of donning procedure of a prosthetic transfemoral socket.
    Lacroix D; Patiño JF
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Dec; 39(12):2972-83. PubMed ID: 21887588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automated hexahedral mesh generation from biomedical image data: applications in limb prosthetics.
    Zachariah SG; Sanders JE; Turkiyyah GM
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1996 Jun; 4(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 8798076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Inertial effects on interface pressure between prosthetic socket and residual limb].
    Jia X; Zhang M; Wang R; Fan Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 22(3):468-71. PubMed ID: 16013238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Load transfer mechanics between trans-tibial prosthetic socket and residual limb--dynamic effects.
    Jia X; Zhang M; Lee WC
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 15275844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modeling and preliminary testing socket-residual limb interface stiffness of above-elbow prostheses.
    Sensinger JW; Weir RF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2008 Apr; 16(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 18403287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Static and dynamic pressure prediction for prosthetic socket fitting assessment utilising an inverse problem approach.
    Sewell P; Noroozi S; Vinney J; Amali R; Andrews S
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 21963113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.
    Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Numerical simulation and experimental testing for static failure prediction in additively manufactured below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Karthik Rajashekar K; Regalla SP; Suresh K; Shrivastava PN
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Feb; 238(2):257-268. PubMed ID: 38214296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Review of the socket design and interface pressure measurement for transtibial prosthesis.
    Pirouzi G; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():849073. PubMed ID: 25197716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictive Control for an Active Prosthetic Socket informed by FEA-based Tissue Damage Risk Estimation.
    Mbithi FM; Chipperfield AJ; Steer JW; Dickinson AS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():2073-2076. PubMed ID: 31946309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasound imaging in lower limb prosthetics.
    Douglas T; Solomonidis S; Sandham W; Spence W
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Mar; 10(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 12173735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sockets for Limb Prostheses: A Review of Existing Technologies and Open Challenges.
    Paterno L; Ibrahimi M; Gruppioni E; Menciassi A; Ricotti L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 65(9):1996-2010. PubMed ID: 29993506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of compression/release stabilized transfemoral prosthetic socket by finite element modelling method.
    Meng Z; Wong DW; Zhang M; Leung AK
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Sep; 83():123-129. PubMed ID: 32527518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A preliminary investigation into the development of 3-D printing of prosthetic sockets.
    Herbert N; Simpson D; Spence WD; Ion W
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 15944878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characterization of interfacial socket pressure in transhumeral prostheses: A case series.
    Schofield JS; Schoepp KR; Williams HE; Carey JP; Marasco PD; Hebert JS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178517. PubMed ID: 28575012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.