BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9774003)

  • 1. Fat necrosis in free and pedicled TRAM flaps.
    Kroll SS; Gherardini G; Martin JE; Reece GP; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Robb GL; Wang BG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Oct; 102(5):1502-7. PubMed ID: 9774003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.
    Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 10987463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps.
    Baumann DP; Lin HY; Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 May; 125(5):1335-1341. PubMed ID: 20440154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Chang DW; Reece GP; Wang B; Robb GL; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jun; 105(7):2374-80. PubMed ID: 10845289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
    Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of morbidity from bilateral, unipedicled and unilateral, unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions.
    Paige KT; Bostwick J; Bried JT; Jones G
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Jun; 101(7):1819-27. PubMed ID: 9623822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. TRAM fat necrosis in a young surgeon's practice: is it experience, technique, or blood flow?
    Jewell RP; Whitney TM
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Apr; 42(4):424-7. PubMed ID: 10213405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Angiographic delay: a viable alternative to surgical delay.
    Aboutanos SZ; Spinos E; Blanchet NP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jun; 68(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 21629075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
    Chang DW; Wang B; Robb GL; Reece GP; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Apr; 105(5):1640-8. PubMed ID: 10809092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
    Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient.
    Moran SL; Serletti JM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Dec; 108(7):1954-60; discussion 1961-2. PubMed ID: 11743383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fat necrosis between zone II and zone III in pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps: a prospective study of 400 consecutive cases.
    Kim EK; Lee TJ; Eom JS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Sep; 59(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 17721210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography in the evaluation of masses in breasts reconstructed with TRAM flaps.
    Eidelman Y; Liebling RW; Buchbinder S; Strauch B; Goldstein RD
    Ann Plast Surg; 1998 Sep; 41(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 9746076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the recipient vessel on fat necrosis after breast reconstruction with a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.
    Kropf N; Macadam SA; McCarthy C; Disa JJ; Pusic AL; Da Lio A; Crisera C; Mehrara BJ
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2010 Apr; 44(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 20465509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bilateral breast reconstruction: conventional versus free TRAM.
    Baldwin BJ; Schusterman MA; Miller MJ; Kroll SS; Wang BG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jun; 93(7):1410-6; discussion 1417. PubMed ID: 8208807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
    Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Necrosis of abdominoplasty and other secondary flaps after TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Oct; 94(5):637-43. PubMed ID: 7938286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the latissimus dorsi flap for recontouring and augmentation after TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Karanas YL; Santoro TD; Shaw WW; Da Lio AL
    Ann Plast Surg; 2002 Apr; 48(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 12068213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequelae in the abdominal wall after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery.
    Suominen S; Asko-Seljavaara S; von Smitten K; Ahovuo J; Sainio P; Alaranta H
    Ann Plast Surg; 1996 Jun; 36(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 8792974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.