These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9774087)

  • 41. The Deschamps Report: controls for clinical research in Quebec.
    Miller J
    J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11655382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Overseeing regulations or intimidating researchers?
    Wax ML; Capron AM
    IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):8-12. PubMed ID: 11661947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Human subject research review in the Department of Defense.
    Winter PE
    IRB; 1984; 6(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Responses to the Gagnon report and REBs.
    Gagnon D;
    NCBHR Commun; 1993; 4(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11652886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Timing is everything for tissue-sample genetics.
    Haglund K
    J NIH Res; 1997 Jan; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 11654602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Health science research ethics: a critique.
    Coburn D
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10125790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The law relating to confidentiality of data acquired by researchers in the biomedical and social sciences.
    Bravender-Coyle P
    Univ Tasman Law Rev; 1986; 8(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 11650864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. IRB jurisdiction and limits on IRB actions.
    Hershey N; Cann CI; Rothman KJ
    IRB; 1985; 7(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Code of Ethics of the Canadian Medical Association.
    CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(8):1176A-1176D. PubMed ID: 8873647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Consent and discontent.
    Wenger NS; Shapiro MF
    CMAJ; 1997 Dec; 157(12):1691-2. PubMed ID: 9418663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The new ethical committees: their nature and role.
    Gillett G
    N Z Med J; 1989 Jun; 102(870):314-5. PubMed ID: 2739984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Informed consent: a reply to Liemohn.
    Landers DM
    Res Q; 1979 Mar; 50(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 472442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Subject reaction: the neglected factor in the ethics of experimentation.
    Milgram S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Oct; 7(5):19-23. PubMed ID: 914509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Subject comprehension, standards of information disclosure and potential liability in research.
    Pullman D
    Health Law J; 2001; 9():113-27. PubMed ID: 12141217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Neuropsychologist's death sparks enquiries.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6477):176. PubMed ID: 8183329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. France urged to change ethics rule.
    Butler D
    Nature; 1993 Oct; 365(6447):597. PubMed ID: 8413619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Extremely preterm infants. A consensus report. Danish Medical Research Council & Danish Hospital Institute.
    Dan Med Bull; 1991 Oct; 38(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 1802625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A national ethics committee.
    Warnock M
    BMJ; 1988 Dec 24-31; 297(6664):1626-7. PubMed ID: 3147761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Research ethics committees.
    BMJ; 1990 Apr; 300(6729):943. PubMed ID: 2337727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.