These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 977429)
21. The McGurk phenomenon in Italian listeners. Bovo R; Ciorba A; Prosser S; Martini A Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2009 Aug; 29(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 20161878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. Takata Y; Nábĕlek AK J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):663-6. PubMed ID: 2212289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Recall and repetition of time-compressed sentential approximations by normal-hearing young adults. Freeman BA; Church G J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 893201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of linguistic background on staggered spondaic word and dichotic consonant vowel scores. Keith RW; Katbamna B; Tawfik S; Smolak LH Br J Audiol; 1987 Feb; 21(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3828581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Illusory double epenthesis in the [s_V] context among Japanese listeners: an exploratory study. Yamada J Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Oct; 115(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 23265008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Aspects of final consonant production in American English by nonnative speakers. Schmidt AM Phonetica; 1989; 46(4):169-80. PubMed ID: 2636387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. First impressions and last resorts: how listeners adjust to speaker variability. Kraljic T; Samuel AG; Brennan SE Psychol Sci; 2008 Apr; 19(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 18399885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intelligibility of distorted speech sounds shifted in frequency and time in normal children. Nagafuchi M Audiology; 1976; 15(4):326-37. PubMed ID: 1275817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intelligibility and acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech in telugu (a South Indian dravidian language). Durisala N; Prakash SG; Nambi A; Batra R Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Apr; 63(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 22468255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of native language on Indian English sounds and timing patterns. Sirsa H; Redford MA J Phon; 2013 Nov; 41(6):393-406. PubMed ID: 24860200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of Compression Ratio on Perception of Time Compressed Phonemically Balanced Words in Kannada and Monosyllables. Prabhu P; Sujan MJ; Rakshith S Audiol Res; 2015 Jan; 5(1):128. PubMed ID: 26557363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Bayesian phylogenetic study of the Dravidian language family. Kolipakam V; Jordan FM; Dunn M; Greenhill SJ; Bouckaert R; Gray RD; Verkerk A R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Mar; 5(3):171504. PubMed ID: 29657761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Technical note: an apparatus for exploring dynamic auditory localization. Devens JS; Hoyer EA; McCroskey RL J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 789310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Post-focus compression in Brahvi and Balochi. Syed NA; Shah AW; Xu A; Xu Y Phonetica; 2022 Jun; 79(2):189-218. PubMed ID: 35689305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]