These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9774724)

  • 1. Somatosensory automatic responses to deviant stimuli.
    Shinozaki N; Yabe H; Sutoh T; Hiruma T; Kaneko S
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1998 Oct; 7(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 9774724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cerebellar damage impairs detection of somatosensory input changes. A somatosensory mismatch-negativity study.
    Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Valeriani M; Leggio MG; Molinari M
    Brain; 2007 Jan; 130(Pt 1):276-87. PubMed ID: 16982654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interaction between afferent input from fingers in human somatosensory cortex.
    Forss N; Jousmäki V; Hari R
    Brain Res; 1995 Jul; 685(1-2):68-76. PubMed ID: 7583255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Centrifugal regulation of task-relevant somatosensory signals to trigger a voluntary movement.
    Kida T; Wasaka T; Nakata H; Kakigi R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 16307265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Somatosensory event-related potentials in the rabbit cerebral and cerebellar cortices: a correspondence with mismatch responses in humans.
    Astikainen P; Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Feb; 298(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 11165446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Somatosensory off-response in humans: an ERP study.
    Yamashiro K; Inui K; Otsuru N; Kida T; Akatsuka K; Kakigi R
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 18584160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of stimulus probability on the somatosensory mismatch field.
    Akatsuka K; Wasaka T; Nakata H; Kida T; Kakigi R
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(4):607-14. PubMed ID: 17516059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Basis of Early Somatosensory Change Detection: A Magnetoencephalography Study.
    Naeije G; Vaulet T; Wens V; Marty B; Goldman S; De Tiège X
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Mar; 31(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 28913778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification and characterization of somatosensory off responses.
    Spackman L; Boyd S; Towell T
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 16952337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential modulation of temporal and frontal components of the somatosensory N140 and the effect of interstimulus interval in a selective attention task.
    Kida T; Nishihira Y; Wasaka T; Nakata H; Sakamoto M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 14972356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of haptic memory using somatosensory change-related cortical responses.
    Sugiyama S; Kinukawa T; Takeuchi N; Nishihara M; Shioiri T; Inui K
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Dec; 41(17):4892-4900. PubMed ID: 32845051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of stimulus frequency and duration on somatosensory discrimination responses.
    Spackman LA; Boyd SG; Towell A
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 177(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 16917766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans.
    Kekoni J; Hämäläinen H; Saarinen M; Gröhn J; Reinikainen K; Lehtokoski A; Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 1997 Aug; 46(2):125-42. PubMed ID: 9288410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibitory effect of intensity and interstimulus interval of conditioning stimuli on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.
    Onishi H; Sugawara K; Yamashiro K; Sato D; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Shirozu H; Kameyama S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 44(4):2104-13. PubMed ID: 27319980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Changes in late components of somatosensory evoked potentials in humans during repetitive stimulation].
    Garkavenko VV; Limanskaia LI; Kapustina MT; Kal'mutskiĭ AB
    Fiziol Zh (1978); 1990; 36(6):18-22. PubMed ID: 2083581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of the human contra- versus ipsilateral SII cortex.
    Wegner K; Forss N; Salenius S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 May; 111(5):894-900. PubMed ID: 10802461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of prior sustained tactile stimulation on the somatosensory response to the sudden change of intensity in humans: an magnetoencephalography study.
    Otsuru N; Inui K; Yamashiro K; Urakawa T; Keceli S; Kakigi R
    Neuroscience; 2011 May; 182():115-24. PubMed ID: 21420471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interaction between somatosensory and auditory cognitive processing assessed with event-related potentials.
    Touge T; Gonzalez D; Wu J; Deguchi K; Tsukaguchi M; Shimamura M; Ikeda K; Kuriyama S
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 25(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 18340272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of nonlinear interactions in event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by stimuli presented at short inter-stimulus intervals.
    Mitsis GD; Iannetti GD
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4834-7. PubMed ID: 21096904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Somatosensory mismatch negativity in healthy children.
    Restuccia D; Zanini S; Cazzagon M; Del Piero I; Martucci L; Della Marca G
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2009 Dec; 51(12):991-8. PubMed ID: 19909309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.