These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9775018)

  • 41. [Radiological follow-up of motion in the cervical spine after surgery].
    Sato T
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Jul; 66(7):607-20. PubMed ID: 1512474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Results of extensive cervical laminectomy].
    am Orde U; Glaesener JJ; Exner G; Gerner HJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 8212814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy.
    Gargiulo G; Girardo M; Rava A; Coniglio A; Cinnella P; Massè A; Fusini F
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Jul; 29(5):975-982. PubMed ID: 30737557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Critical analysis of extensive cervical laminectomy.
    Ishida Y; Suzuki K; Ohmori K; Kikata Y; Hattori Y
    Neurosurgery; 1989 Feb; 24(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 2918972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cervical Laminectomy With or Without Lateral Mass Instrumentation: A Comparison of Outcomes.
    Kim BS; Dhillon RS
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Jul; 32(6):226-232. PubMed ID: 31206395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. C-5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty with instrumented posterior fusion.
    Yamanaka K; Tachibana T; Moriyama T; Okada F; Maruo K; Inoue S; Horinouchi Y; Yoshiya S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jan; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 24160298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The use of flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating signal intensity changes of the cervical spinal cord.
    Guppy KH; Hawk M; Chakrabarti I; Banerjee A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 19441996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum 5-year follow-up data.
    Hyun SJ; Riew KD; Rhim SC
    Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 23218824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Radiculopathy after cervical laminectomy].
    Dai L; Ni B; Yuan W; Jia L
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Oct; 37(10):605-6. PubMed ID: 11829904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.
    Maruo K; Moriyama T; Tachibana T; Inoue S; Arizumi F; Daimon T; Yoshiya S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):938-43. PubMed ID: 25279653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty: its characteristics and relationship with clinical results.
    Iizuka H; Iizuka Y; Nakagawa Y; Nakajima T; Toda N; Shimegi A; Tsutsumi S; Takagishi K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):644-7. PubMed ID: 16540867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy.
    Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1988 Jul; 13(7):774-80. PubMed ID: 3194786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of dynamic alignment, motion, and center of rotation on myelopathy grade and regional disability in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Liu S; Lafage R; Smith JS; Protopsaltis TS; Lafage VC; Challier V; Shaffrey CI; Radcliff K; Arnold PM; Chapman JR; Schwab FJ; Massicotte EM; Yoon ST; Fehlings MG; Ames CP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 26315953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up.
    Hyun SJ; Rhim SC; Roh SW; Kang SH; Riew KD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1134-9. PubMed ID: 19444059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Postoperative instability after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with spondylolisthesis.
    Sakai Y; Matsuyama Y; Inoue K; Ishiguro N
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Feb; 18(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15687844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Laminectomy and postero-lateral mass plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Punjaisee S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Jul; 87(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 15521231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Anterior revision surgery for the treatment of cervical spondylosis after anterior decompression and titanium mesh fusion].
    Chen BH; Gu SR; Zhang M; Sang PM; Li J
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Feb; 27(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 24826477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cervical kyphosis and myelopathy. Treatment by anterior corpectomy and strut-grafting.
    Zdeblick TA; Bohlman HH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1989 Feb; 71(2):170-82. PubMed ID: 2645290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Analysis of the cervical spine alignment following laminoplasty and laminectomy.
    Matsunaga S; Sakou T; Nakanisi K
    Spinal Cord; 1999 Jan; 37(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 10025690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Analysis of cervical spine curvature in patients with cervical spondylosis.
    Batzdorf U; Batzdorff A
    Neurosurgery; 1988 May; 22(5):827-36. PubMed ID: 3380271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.